Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:r_bakalov@yahoo.com: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2 bands, 2 sigs, same station (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:01:40 -0500
Why do you want to move the data at all? Build a CW Skimmer infrastructure in the Amazon Cloud and do all the storage and processing there. The benefit is unlimited computing resources to process and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00049.html (12,221 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving voice recordings for phone contests (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 05:25:19 -0800 (PST)
Have you guys tried using AT&T Labs' text to speech site? See http://www2.research.att.com/~ttsweb/tts/demo.php  You won't be using your own voice, but at the very least the voice will be consistent.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00134.html (11,168 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving voice recordings for phone contests (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:25:29 -0800 (PST)
It is amazing, isn't it! I just found out that you can add extra tags to the text box and play with the way the voice is generated. For example, select Mike's voice and enter the following: <prosody
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00140.html (13,983 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving voice recordings for phone contests (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:45:57 -0800 (PST)
It is scary, but it seems there is a standard for everything, including text to speech conversion http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-synthesis/ So, yes, the recording can be tweaked to suit our contesting n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00142.html (15,474 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving voice recordings for phone contests (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:48:53 -0800 (PST)
The idea is to pre-record it ALL so that SSB contesting becomes the same as CW or RTTY contesting. Use the mic only in extreme situations. Works great for the exchange as well <prosody rate="+50%"> K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00143.html (15,768 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
I wonder if good old POTS and modems are unjustly ignored as a viable option for carrying the control channel and audio; computer screen sharing can still go over the net. POTS have the benefit of pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00238.html (16,939 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Today's networks carry nothing but data. Voice, including from traditional carriers, is being carried as data over the same pipes that carry the internet traffic. The difference is in the guaranteed
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00242.html (19,697 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is the wpx a prefix test or dx contest? (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 03:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
I don't think the presented analysis has proven conclusively anything. The comparison was against a single station. What happens when Rick compares his score against K1TTT, a station fairly close to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00087.html (21,619 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Understanding the dynamic error free RBN algorithm - The DR1A case (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 07:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Jose, Thank you for your time and energy to improve the usefulness of the RBN, an already incredibly useful tool. I noticed that your analysis is based on stations that generate a lot of spots, su
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00176.html (16,257 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] : Reverse beacon of my own call? (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
So this would mean that the use of Zone Prop, HamCap, etc., combined with real time feed of sun spot numbers and other similar solar data to assess propagation and determine on which bands to operate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00296.html (12,462 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simultaneous receive and transmit in one radio? (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 05:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Flex 5000 with the second receiver and Anan100D Rudy N2WQ I wonder... in the CQWW rules for the Cklassic overlay it says " The one radio must not be able to receive while transmitting."  I did not be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00132.html (9,094 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Classic - Doing what was intended? (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Perhaps now that WRTC2014 team leads have been selected there is no incentive for the top contesters to do the entire 48 hours. Rudy N2WQ After seeing literally more than a dozen well known contester
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00414.html (9,036 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2 point rule (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:30:52 -0800 (PST)
Randy, The survey excluded demographics data and therefore we simply don't know if it polled the right people. Ditto for the members of the CQ Contest reflectorchances are most of them have the incen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00448.html (11,637 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:55:04 -0800 (PST)
If the software already supports Stew Perry and/or Makrothen, then it already supports exchanging grid squares and distance based scoring. N1MM, WinTest, and WriteLog already do so. Rudy N2WQ _______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00467.html (12,185 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] Any J7 (Dominica) hams? (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:46:07 -0800 (PST)
I'd like to get in touch with anyone local to J7. 73, Rudy N2WQ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00144.html (6,685 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Size of Dual Monitors (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:48:52 -0400
Dick, I use 3 monitors, 2 x 24 and 1 x 20". As I do RTTY, I run n1mm with 4 parallel decoders per radio and the decoders to take space. The third monitor runs real time propagation modeling via DX At
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00143.html (10,499 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu