- 1. [CQ-Contest] Food for thought - 40m CQWW SSB (score: 1)
- Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <ragnar@otterstad.dk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:12:01 +0100
- This is worth forwarding: I think one point being missed in your posting is whether it is acceptable to take away all space for CW mode operators for the entire 48 Hours of the CQWW SSB contest, the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00160.html (12,740 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] SWL report 160m saturday morning (score: 1)
- Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <ragnar@otterstad.dk>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:05:13 +0100
- I woke up late, 0715 UTC but decided to take a look on 160 for the contest. The band was full of US stns and I worked a few of those with good ears. It was disappointing to call stns with good signal
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00050.html (7,400 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] arrl160 (score: 1)
- Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <ragnar@otterstad.dk>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:17:21 +0100
- I just worked some 30 + stns but wonder where do you send the log ? to Newington or what ? Tnx 73 rag LA5HE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00080.html (6,316 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu