Mail Archive Search: <+from:ramirezk@emi.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ramirezk@emi.com: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

41. International Team Going to KP4! (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Thu Mar 14 20:25:02 1996; I know this is digressing from the normal subject matter of late but just thought I'd let you all know that the KP4XS WPX SSB Multi-Multi Team will be heading for Western Puerto Rico next week for th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00025.html (8,093 bytes)
42. Contest elitists,Savants,WRTC,etc (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Thu Mar 14 20:25:08 1996; Hello! My original intentions were to let everyone else vent and just sit back and bite my tongue but a couple of the last messages seen here have stirred up the cranial juices. What I have seen here; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00026.html (10,675 bytes)
43. Andrews Hardline connector question (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Sat Mar 16 10:55:13 1996; Hello OMs! Does an Andrews Female N-connector that has been PROPERLY installed on Andrews LDF5-50 7/8 inch Hardline need to be sealed against moisture entry? Here is my situation. I have a run of And; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00041.html (9,304 bytes)
44. Andrew Connector Part Deux (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Sat Mar 16 18:02:25 1996; Thanks for all the responses guys! The answer is Yes.Extra waterproofing is needed for an absolute watertight seal. Every splice at my QTH is triple sealed with layers of electrical tape and Rubber s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00049.html (14,485 bytes)
45. Taping Coax to a tower leg. (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Sat Mar 16 19:20:31 1996; I have found that using tape to secure coax to the tower legs is not such a good idea. The moisture buildup under the tape will eventually rust that portion of the tower leg;even a well galvanized to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00051.html (6,992 bytes)
46. Who will be the first to admit... (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Tue Mar 19 15:45:24 1996; they they lost a deposit on a "State of the Art" Atlas 400X transceiver? Was anyone on here fooled? The picture of the radio was worth a thousand words. "Caveat Emptor!"; or better said,"Depositors e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00086.html (6,492 bytes)
47. Dxpeditions and Skinny Cats. (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Wed Mar 20 07:34:48 1996; For those of you that believe that Dxpeditions are made by Fat Cats with loaded wallets here is a breakdown of our KP4 trip for WPX SSB. Average airfare cost per person- 250.00 R/T Average meal cost; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00095.html (18,526 bytes)
48. News Flash-WE ARE READY!!! (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Tue Mar 26 05:27:12 1996; Had the greatest Conch in Garlic last night!! We also downed a bottle of rum to celebrate the completion of the station at KP4XS! Everything is working great! The 40m ground plane with elevated radia; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00142.html (7,300 bytes)
49. The trials and Tribs of KP4XS M/M (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Wed Apr 3 15:40:37 1996; Hi Guys, Thanks for the q points this past weekend. We had our share of troubles and conditions were very poor but we managed to eek out a respectable score. Watch out next year! Major improvements w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00024.html (42,982 bytes)
50. Trials and Tribs. of KP4XS M/M Text Version (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Wed Apr 3 18:13:02 1996; I finally figured out how to insert text from a .txt file into the body of the message. Please excuse the way it wound up here. I typed it in a DOS editor and it didn't get transferred the way I had; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00026.html (23,255 bytes)
51. I.C.E. = Great Customer Service! (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Thu Apr 4 20:22:26 1996; Hi! Just in case some of you did not get a chance to read the my little story on the KP4XS M/M effort I thought I would relate a very pleasant experience we had with I.C.E. We accidentally burned out; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00036.html (7,169 bytes)
52. Force 12 -3 el 20m yagi- SHWEET! (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Thu Apr 4 20:22:33 1996; The Force 12 3 element 20m yagi arrived 2 days before the contest in a 4 foot tall box. The instructions were flawless and the antenna went together very easily. I love the hairpin match! The storage; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00037.html (6,954 bytes)
53. A 15m observation WPX SSB (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Thu Apr 4 20:22:36 1996; When the 15m band finally sprang to life at about 1800z on Saturday I had the chance to run US and Europe for a change. This was something I hadn't had a chance to do this my KH2F days back in Guam a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00038.html (16,636 bytes)
54. A 15m observation WPX SSB (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Fri Apr 5 19:17:42 1996; Asking "what's your call" and then disappearing without a QSO or ever IDing is not legal OM. The majority of the guys that ask that question are never heard from again once the call is given. It is r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00046.html (14,113 bytes)
55. Contesting and the Internet? (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Sat Apr 20 22:46:44 1996; Fellow Radio Enthusiasts, Whatever happened to Non-amateur means of communications not being allowed to solicit or make qsos in a contest? It appears to me that the Internet is a NON Amateur means of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00144.html (8,320 bytes)
56. SOA (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Sun Sep 29 21:51:26 1996; It's obvious Rich that you did not attend the Dayton contest forum a few years ago! It was there that a WELLKNOWN contester boldly said that he purposely made bogus packet spots in order to create a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00169.html (37,016 bytes)
57. Fcc and Vanity(delete if not interested) (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Sun Oct 6 10:31:49 1996; To all of you complaining about the FCC and vanity procedures, What mess are you referring to? The FCC is doing it the fairest way possible under the circumstances. Just because they fouled up your p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00040.html (7,406 bytes)
58. Help needed-SB-220 Ip meter/parts (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Tue Oct 8 19:07:44 1996; The Cabo Rojo Contest Club is in need of a Heathkit Plate current meter for an SB-220. I understand that the meter movement of a Heathkit HM-102 wattmeter will also work. Does anyone have this meter; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00062.html (7,150 bytes)
59. LU's novices new frequencies (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Wed Oct 23 18:20:19 1996; Can someone refresh my memory? Doesn't this new LU novice 10m frequency assignment conflict with a gentlemen's agreement that was made with one of the contest sponsors that called for NO contest acti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00144.html (8,892 bytes)
60. LU's novices new frequencies (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Wed Oct 23 22:08:05 1996; Yes Mike, as a matter of fact ,it really DOES matter. If an agreement was reached by someone,a group,etc with someone else,some other group,etc., to keep contesting out of that portion of the band in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00147.html (12,926 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]