Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rayn6vr@gmail.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Power Level (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:08:31 -0700
Tree, and others, The NAQP was setup and designed to run 100 watts max, and not for others to do whatever they want to do with the rules. When the NAQP rules were established, there was no talk of "l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00059.html (8,805 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] All the Assisted ops, where do they all come from? (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 23:51:40 -0700
Let's get real guys, The single op unassisted category says that no external means (internet, RF or whatever) can be used to assist in making a QSO. Just because someone else spots you has nothing to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00151.html (11,195 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 Point for Intra-Country QSOs (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:05:01 -0700
With the present scoring system on the CQ 160 and other 160m contests, they have become mostly just another domestic contest. I seldom compete in them now days but I will look to work the DX stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00150.html (13,565 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hallucinations (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:25:25 -0700
Years ago, when I worked in the oil field logging business, my crew and I ran very sophisticated equipment to log/map newly drilled wells offshore California. Some wells were 11,000 ft to 13,000 ft d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00384.html (9,686 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS and CW contesting (score: 1)
Author: rayn6vr <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:09:54 -0700
Why make SS like all the rest of the contests? It's not all about more mults and more band qsos. I guess I'm getting old and enjoy some of the old ways. Ray,N6VR  Yuri VE3DZ It has now been 10 years
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00208.html (10,363 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Hardline adapter 7/8" to 1/2"? (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:22:50 -0700
Does anyone know if there is an adapter made for Andrews 7/8" hardline to Andrews 1/2" hardline? How about the same using coax DIN connectors? I have never used them but they get good reviews. I have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-01/msg00053.html (7,294 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hardline adapter 7/8" to 1/2"? (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:59:17 -0700
Tnx all, Sounds good. Will look into ordering 7/16" DIN connectors for each size hardline, preferably M/F of each. Ray, N6VR/W7YA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-01/msg00062.html (9,756 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking up on QRZ.com (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 20:51:43 -0700
Your log is supplied to reflect what you copied in real time! In most contests, using outside sources to correct a log is illegal. Ray, N6VR/W7YA _______________________________________________ CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-06/msg00008.html (9,751 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu