Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rjairam@gmail.com: 590 ]

Total 590 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [CQ-Contest] OT: DMR repeaters in Friedrichshafen? (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:32:44 -0400
I don't see any repeaters in Friedrichshafen proper. http://www.cqdmrmap.com/ Closest are DM0KV in Konstanz and DB0RV near Ravensburg which I guess is not that far. They are affiliated with DMR+. Inc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00075.html (8,412 bytes)

202. Re: [CQ-Contest] OT: DMR repeaters in Friedrichshafen? (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:25:15 +0000
It has been a pretty interesting foray into it for me. I found that it is restrictive in some respects but better than DSTAR and fusion in others. I'm usually on 91 worldwide when I'm at home via my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00076.html (10,269 bytes)

203. Re: [CQ-Contest] Last reminder: This Saturday - SA Sprint Contest - From 2000 to 2359 Z (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 01:17:30 +0000
I had fun! But I made two q's out of band (oops) however they are marked in the log as X-QSO. Easy to forget. Hoping to do the next one! 73/88 Ria, N2RJ ______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00096.html (9,781 bytes)

204. Re: [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 17:33:49 -0400
You mean compared to what happens now on FB messenger, skype and whatsapp? Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00107.html (9,357 bytes)

205. Re: [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 17:34:40 -0400
I like this idea a lot. But if you can keep a log in case of cheating allegations that would help to, to be revealed only AFTER the contest is over. 73 Ria, N2RJ _____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00108.html (10,372 bytes)

206. Re: [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:57:56 -0400
Which is why I stay out of the chat room during contests... Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00112.html (12,664 bytes)

207. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Contest Changes for 2017-2018 - Sept QST p91 (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 21:01:37 +0000
Thanks Bart. A discussion that was had here on this reflector some months ago seems to have been clarified: *Remote-Controlled-Station Entries* Acting as the control operator for a remote-controlled
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00131.html (11,026 bytes)

208. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:29:54 +0000
My understanding is that it becomes multi op ONLY If someone assumes control operator duties under the FCC definition, which is: (13) *Control operator.* An amateur operator designated by the license
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00136.html (10,161 bytes)

209. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:00:36 -0400
I think most of you are missing the point in this, in that the rule regarding control operators turning the entry into a multi-op is aimed at foreign ops who operate US stations remotely. If you are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00146.html (13,152 bytes)

210. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Contest Changes for 2017-2018 - Sept QST p91 (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:06:39 -0400
The problem is that if he's using an IC-751 that it doesn't have a CAT facility built in without an external option. This is what is available now: https://www.piexx.com/?main_page=product_info&produ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00148.html (11,476 bytes)

211. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:18:29 +0000
The easy solution is that any foreign op who wants to operate a US station can take the VE exams and get a US license, as many have done. There are even VE sessions overseas. 73 Ria, N2RJ ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00153.html (11,977 bytes)

212. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:51:24 -0400
How far do you go? Is it okay for the station owner to do things like adjust the antenna switching while the operator continues to make QSOs? How about turning the antenna(s) or dealing with computer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00162.html (16,698 bytes)

213. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interference to or from a buried invisible dog fence? (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:33:43 -0400
I have 2 neighbors about a 1/4 mile away with the electric fences. No issues whatsoever on any band. 73 Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00172.html (9,821 bytes)

214. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ? (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:26:13 -0400
I do not want to compete with the cluster. Period, end of story. I don't care of they score worse or better. There is a different mindset using assisted and unassisted - one of them you are basically
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00203.html (13,391 bytes)

215. Re: [CQ-Contest] TH7 Replacement (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 15:29:32 -0400
I would second the JK. Made in USA and built like a tank. 73 Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00045.html (10,292 bytes)

216. Re: [CQ-Contest] TH7 Replacement (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 21:04:05 +0000
I have had a SteppIR (MonstIR, the big one like what they had at 6Y1V). I do agree that the instant band changes and reliability are a concern. The plastic gears were problematic. Supposedly they've
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00052.html (10,182 bytes)

217. Re: [CQ-Contest] TH7 Replacement (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:20:01 -0400
I have the big one like what they had at 6Y1V. It is not made anymore. It is 70ft across straight elements. Full sized on 40. The DB42 is called the MonstIR but it's not the actual, original MonstIR.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00065.html (9,938 bytes)

218. Re: [CQ-Contest] TH7 Replacement (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:26:02 -0400
It has 5 elements, a relay switching network and passive fixed elements for 6m. Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00066.html (10,434 bytes)

219. Re: [CQ-Contest] TH7 Replacement (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 18:17:39 +0000
I have a good crane and rigging guy. There are others who use a tram or tilt over. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00067.html (12,689 bytes)

220. Re: [CQ-Contest] TH7 Replacement (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 20:56:37 -0400
I get the impression that SteppIR viewed it as going past the point of diminishing returns. They could get almost the performance with much less wind loads using the trombone elements, thus the DB-36
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00080.html (10,528 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu