Mail Archive Search: <+from:rjohnson@tmlp.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rjohnson@tmlp.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Proposed QST changes, Hit 'em where it Hurts $$$ (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Fri Jan 11 22:22:30 2002; As I see it the League is about to embark on another one of there ill advised "Cost Cutting Schemes" at our expense sometime next week!!! If we want to maintain FULL Contest coverage in QST, we might; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00225.html (9,636 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Sat Jan 12 20:05:12 2002; Hi: Being a Life Member of the NRA since 1963 I can only say that one of the worst things the NRA did was to fractionate the membership into "Us and Them" when they came out with "The American Riflem; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00263.html (10,707 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: [YCCC] Proposed QST changes, Hit 'emwhere it Hurts $$$ (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Sat Jan 12 21:51:11 2002; Hi Jan: First, let me say that sometimes in order to get a mules attention, you need to hit it over the head with a 2X4 !!! In the case of the League and the BOD the 2X4 is $$$$ !!! You, having worke; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00264.html (19,113 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Proposed QST changes, Hit 'em where it Hurts$$$ (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Sun Jan 13 14:25:22 2002; Amateur still don't My comments were to get the attention of the BOD so they could stop and think of the ramifications of this ill conceived proposal. K1KI is my director and I try to copy him on my; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00329.html (12,996 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Mon Jan 14 11:21:37 2002; Actually it is 3 rags, don't forget QEX/CQ Communication Quarterly !!! I think the League could stand to dump both publications, recoup the publishing costs, and gain advertising $$$ by increasing QS; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00330.html (13,471 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Scores not part of Contest coverage?? Was:Too many contests? (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Wed Jan 16 15:15:16 2002; Tree, I beg to differ with you, the "Listing" Contest Scores in QST is the major reason for having Contest Coverage, not the "Fluff Stuff" we now have. As far as getting a bunch of people more upset; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00359.html (7,896 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] ARRL VHF SS Web Survey (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Thu Jan 24 21:26:42 2002; QST: All VHF/UHF and HF contesters: This is IMPORTANT !!! The ARRL posted a VHF SS Survey Monday. My guess is that it will end Saturday or Sunday, so don't wait Please, everyone that worked the ARRL; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00539.html (7,297 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] CT and NAQP ??? (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Sat Aug 17 13:15:37 2002; Hi: Just went to set CT V9.80 up for NAQP and can't find the contest listed in contests supported. Am I missing something ??? Are we supposed to use one of the other contests for NAQP ??? 73 Bob, K1V; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00185.html (6,159 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]