Mail Archive Search: <+from:ronklein@vnet.ibm.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ronklein@vnet.ibm.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Thu Feb 25 07:28:24 1993; Interesting discussion on contest duration. I've only been at contesting about 11 years, and enjoy it immensely when the rest of my life permits. I think the win-win idea is to add a 24 hour category; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00174.html (8,257 bytes)
2. Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Sat Feb 27 08:16:06 1993; Let me be a little more specific on my previous post in favor of 24 hour contests. I'd propose this for single ops, that it be a subcategory of the existing 48 hour periods. As others have pointed ou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00191.html (7,233 bytes)
3. Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Thu Feb 25 07:28:24 1993; Interesting discussion on contest duration. I've only been at contesting about 11 years, and enjoy it immensely when the rest of my life permits. I think the win-win idea is to add a 24 hour category; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00229.html (8,269 bytes)
4. Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Sat Feb 27 08:16:06 1993; Let me be a little more specific on my previous post in favor of 24 hour contests. I'd propose this for single ops, that it be a subcategory of the existing 48 hour periods. As others have pointed ou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00230.html (7,201 bytes)
5. Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Thu Feb 25 07:28:24 1993; Interesting discussion on contest duration. I've only been at contesting about 11 years, and enjoy it immensely when the rest of my life permits. I think the win-win idea is to add a 24 hour category; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00267.html (8,281 bytes)
6. Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Sat Feb 27 08:16:06 1993; Let me be a little more specific on my previous post in favor of 24 hour contests. I'd propose this for single ops, that it be a subcategory of the existing 48 hour periods. As others have pointed ou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00268.html (7,194 bytes)
7. Phone SS results - W0OSK (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (ronklein@vnet.ibm.com); Date: Tue Dec 8 08:45:59 1992; For anyone compiling a summary of scores I had 1471Qs/77 sections/226,534 points in the High Power Single Op category. If anyone has a current summary I would appreciate receiving it. I saw some of t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00098.html (6,786 bytes)
8. Phone SS scores list (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Wed Dec 9 06:28:18 1992; Thanks to the several who sent me copies of these scores. I will be curious to see how the published ARRL results compare. Ron - W0OSK; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00108.html (6,221 bytes)
9. Mosley PRO-67B (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Thu Dec 10 06:56:13 1992; I installed a PRO67B on my existing 50 foot tower in September. It is a fine performer. I have no empirical data to compare to a TH-7 or KT-34XA, but in the Phone SS, it performed extremely well. 40; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00141.html (8,088 bytes)
10. Phone SS results - W0OSK (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (ronklein@vnet.ibm.com); Date: Tue Dec 8 08:45:59 1992; For anyone compiling a summary of scores I had 1471Qs/77 sections/226,534 points in the High Power Single Op category. If anyone has a current summary I would appreciate receiving it. I saw some of t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00299.html (6,808 bytes)
11. Phone SS scores list (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Wed Dec 9 06:28:18 1992; Thanks to the several who sent me copies of these scores. I will be curious to see how the published ARRL results compare. Ron - W0OSK; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00301.html (6,214 bytes)
12. Mosley PRO-67B (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Thu Dec 10 06:56:13 1992; I installed a PRO67B on my existing 50 foot tower in September. It is a fine performer. I have no empirical data to compare to a TH-7 or KT-34XA, but in the Phone SS, it performed extremely well. 40; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00308.html (8,090 bytes)
13. Phone SS results - W0OSK (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (ronklein@vnet.ibm.com); Date: Tue Dec 8 08:45:59 1992; For anyone compiling a summary of scores I had 1471Qs/77 sections/226,534 points in the High Power Single Op category. If anyone has a current summary I would appreciate receiving it. I saw some of t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00345.html (6,786 bytes)
14. Phone SS scores list (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Wed Dec 9 06:28:18 1992; Thanks to the several who sent me copies of these scores. I will be curious to see how the published ARRL results compare. Ron - W0OSK; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00347.html (6,244 bytes)
15. Mosley PRO-67B (score: 1): Author: ronklein@vnet.ibm.com (R.D. Klein); Date: Thu Dec 10 06:56:13 1992; I installed a PRO67B on my existing 50 foot tower in September. It is a fine performer. I have no empirical data to compare to a TH-7 or KT-34XA, but in the Phone SS, it performed extremely well. 40; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00354.html (8,089 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]