I don't think so. I see a penalty as being for claiming a Q that is incorrect, either intentionally or inadvertently. You are not claiming the Q. How about sending a checklog with just that Q on it,
Hello, All: I have been unable to get past 15 or 16 WPM. I can't hand print fast enough, and trying to type without error which would create busted calls hasn't been any faster. Copying in my head is
Mike-- it is easy to understand your reluctance to publicise the calls of the DQed ops. But how about a statement to the effect that: One Op has been banned for life because he did <abc>. Another Op
On the rare occasion when I have a log worthy of interest, I would be only to happy to have it public; in fact, I would like to show it off. That said, I wonder if a policy of publishing all scores,
Many handheld GPS units have a selectable Map Datum choice, and one of the choices is sometimes the Maidenhead system. The user can select the Maidenhead, read the maidenhead grid designation at his
This little gun does not agree. If the top score op in w/ve or whatever is also the top score op in the world, then he won both trophies. Magnaminity has nothing to do with it, unless we start to fol
Richard, if I were the 2nd top Texas station, I would be happy to receive recognition for the extraordinary effort required for that accomplishment. If you were the Top Texas station, then you should
Richard, if that were to happen, then I would have taken 2nd World, 2nd N.A., 2nd USA, etc. My accomplishment would have been 2nd to yours. I would be very proud of that. You should be recognized as