Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:s56a@bit.si: 364 ]

Total 364 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:49:55 +0100
Just run N1MM Logger, connected to N4ZR Skimmer for the first time with a great delight! There are plenty of USA DXC spots thanks to M/M giants but not enough from EU or JA. I just got 1 kW from my G
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00374.html (7,871 bytes)

182. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hunting in Africa (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:23:01 +0100
KY1V: Imagine...you could operate 6Y1V from the comfort of your living room. I vividly remember late Bill, W4AN QSO from his GA office using remote station in the mountains! The highest temptation wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00511.html (8,413 bytes)

183. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer ultimate setup? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:14:06 +0100
HA1AG: I'm afraid w4pa was right: if it goes on like this cw contesting won't be a measure of individual performance anymore. 48 hours SO2R split CW single tone listening is the measure of individual
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00512.html (8,149 bytes)

184. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hunting in Africa (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:01:11 +0100
KY1V: If we wish to discuss elimination of cheating, let's talk about eliminating the cheaters, not every potential methods of cheating. Encouraging steps were made at last WRTC, open logs, IARU adju
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00544.html (8,226 bytes)

185. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re; Skimmer Ultimate Setup (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:53:20 +0100
EI5DI: And occasionally think of how you have debased amateur radio - then put aside those idle thoughts and relax while the log fills up all by itself :-) The comm world has moved from radio to blac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00600.html (9,175 bytes)

186. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers and Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:30:14 +0100
Maybe we should be talking about an entirely new class structure for single-ops -- something like "Advanced" and "Traditional". Or maybe three levels - "Traditional", "Advanced" and "Unlimited". Cons
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00620.html (7,346 bytes)

187. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs humans in KCDXC pileup competition (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:32:40 +0100
There seems to be a lot of space for improvement of Skimmer decoding for single contest callers. My 1990's research on KCDXC pile-up 3 kHz audio channel with 64 streams brought 80% score against my 6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00647.html (8,001 bytes)

188. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:04:10 +0200
K1AR wrote: Using M6T is legal and allowed by the rules. Not sending a report is illegal and specifically against the rules. As I just exchanged few emails with K1AR about stupid WPX robot which canc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00802.html (9,225 bytes)

189. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:47:39 +0200
ARRL 2% DQ criteria is too harsh as average hams error rate is around 3%! Especially at our demographics :-) I vividly remember 5B4AGD 2000 operation with WPX legend Rasa, YU1RL under Ranko, then YT6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00060.html (7,514 bytes)

190. Re: [CQ-Contest] 59 - Just do it (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:35:12 +0200
K1TTT: If I were doing wpx cw under my call I would send an rst of TTT, now that would be fun! Make it shorter - ETT! I used AR as a lot of time is wasted in letter spaces :-) 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00074.html (7,257 bytes)

191. Re: [CQ-Contest] USB to Serial Adaptors (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:48:54 +0200
I can live with two PC COM ports for separate CAT, PTT and KEY radio controls as MMTTY supports EXTFSK on LPT. It might be legacy curse but I feel better without USB software and RFI bugs! Beware tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00155.html (6,646 bytes)

192. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sunspots / SolarFlux (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 21:55:21 +0200
High quality EU sunspots on sale with 60% discount for ARRL members which voted overwhelmingly for preservation of Morse code as HF entry requirement. Dollars accepted. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU ______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00188.html (6,899 bytes)

193. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dayton PileUp Winner (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 09:01:20 +0200
N6TR wrote: Technically - the skimmer should still get almost the same 31 it got before - maybe losing a few calls that were too close to each other in frequency. I had some 80% DSP CW pile-up decodi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00268.html (8,227 bytes)

194. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmmer vs. Humans at KCDXC (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 23:47:06 +0200
There are two physical limitations with Morse code pile-ups: close spaced signals and dot timing constraint. 40 wpm dot lasts only 30 msec and several samples are required for reliable decoding. 3 kH
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00293.html (7,814 bytes)

195. Re: [CQ-Contest] What Skimmer is! (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:51:19 +0200
K5ZD wrote: we want to keep humans in the call finding business rather than having skimmer do it. We have that but some old fashioned contesters didn't like humans sharing these findings over DXC. Wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00146.html (8,762 bytes)

196. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer for S/O in IARU (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:16:39 +0200
KY1V of Jamaica fame nicely sumarized computers contribution to hamradio contesting. There is only one awesome step left PC robot automatically starting logical CW transmission (not only CQ loop). Iv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00151.html (8,532 bytes)

197. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:33:37 +0200
ES5TV: they participate in non-assisted class because that is were you get real credit for what you have done in terms of developing your skills and building your stations. The milestones in building
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00384.html (8,540 bytes)

198. Re: [CQ-Contest] single-op pornography (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:23:16 +0200
KR2Q: The single-op is "exploring" (unless passing) while the SOA is taking directed actions. Single op. with Skimmer is doing intelligent band search using DSP technology while OF are slowly turning
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00397.html (7,342 bytes)

199. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real World Testing The Packet/Skimmer Score IncreaseHypothesis (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:30:32 +0200
K1TTT wrote: The big worry seems to be that the use of the skimmer would upset the apple cart so badly that perennial winners would get beaten. I guess N5TJ @ VE3EJ score convinced assisted doubters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00426.html (7,430 bytes)

200. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:31:49 +0200
K5GO wrote: It would be interesting to see if the original author of the rules honestly thought a single operator should be able to work from a list of stations he had nothing to do with finding as l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00437.html (8,820 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu