Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Getscores.org Changes/Improvements... (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:53:54 -0500
If the SO purists believe that W4** telling me that JY8** is up the band 10 kHz, is assistance, then a multi-multi telling me (even if from a score-board) that it is on 10 meters running Europe is cl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00302.html (8,800 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza Room (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:31:00 -0500
Hi John, Nice to see you again. I am also looking for a room if you happen to find two--we XA's have to stick together!! 73 Saul K2XA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00370.html (6,895 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Favorite Ploys (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:09:41 -0500
Actually, in the recent CQ 160 CW test a well known VHFer had a very bad buzz on his signal. I wonder if he really logged the 597 that I sent him and put in my log? K2XA _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00595.html (6,539 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:06:55 -0500
I think some people on this reflector need to take some valium. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00034.html (6,919 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Boxing Ring at Dayton (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:22:12 -0500
I was doing a single band 20, so I got up at 1000Z Sunday morning to check the band and "find" a frequency to run. On a totally dead band two premier multis were both on 14.150.4 calling cq over each
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00074.html (7,926 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:28:17 -0500
Bob, Great job putting this whole open log nonsense into perspective--and to rest?? Clearly the paragraph refers to Accrediting DX contacts, and especially DX-peditions . Maybe some hams ought to sti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00126.html (7,415 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Subject: "Reverse Beacon" Progress Report (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:16:06 -0400
I can see all kinds of mischief from this--In the good old days it was not unknown for someone stuck in a big packet pile-up at the end of the contest on 20 meters to put out a bogus rare spot to "th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00219.html (7,198 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using"skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 17:17:58 -0400
Bob, You know that generally you and I see eye-to-eye on most radio things, but sorry not here. Hypothetical: I am casually operating in a DX contest over a weekend. I have about 20 hours in the seat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00127.html (7,511 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:40:16 -0400
Everyone now, Let's see if we all can just ignore Joe's comments and not start another useless thread. Thanks. 73 Saul K2XA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00238.html (7,271 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Phone (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:10:57 -0400
2008 ARRL DX Phone results are out. Saul K2XA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00291.html (6,678 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX LCR - they remove Uniques? (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:33:12 -0400
Doug, None of the uniques in my log were removed. Also, I disagree that 99% of uniques are busted calls. That may be true for a qrp contester, but for a high power station with big antennas in a grea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00019.html (7,653 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:00:34 -0400
Someone mistakenly interpreted my earlier comment about uniques and high power versus QRP as a knock on the abilities of QRP ops. That was certainly not my intention. This is what I sent him: NO!!!!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00053.html (8,026 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Some thoughts on uniques, was: 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:07:05 -0400
I checked my LCRs for every ARRL DX test back to 2003 and never had a unique removed. 73 Saul K2XA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00091.html (7,334 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Some thoughts on uniques, was: 99% of uniques are busted (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:57:54 -0400
Pete, No, you did not lose qsos for your uniques. There is a one qso penalty for each busted call, so you lost 14 qsos for your 7 busted calls. Saul K2XA _____________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00095.html (7,307 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Alpha 77DX (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:16:43 -0500
I posted this message on the Amps Site but got no answers. I assume there must be several contesters out there using the 77DX. Thanks for any info. I recently got an Alpha 77DX that was factory refur
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00117.html (7,027 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Xtreme Category: the sky is NOT falling (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:44:05 -0400
What you fail to recognize is that contacts are two way. Even if I report that I am running a remote receiver (and the ARRL said that this will not count for DXCC) the M0xxx running ten watts to a di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00234.html (7,218 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu