Mail Archive Search: <+from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu: 198 ]

Total 198 documents matching your query.

121. CW Sprint QRM (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Sep 8 13:41:40 1992; Did anyone else have problems with some guy sending nonsense cw deliberately right on top of the station you were trying to copy? He wasn't very strong, but seemed to zero in on the weak ones. Showed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-09/msg00028.html (6,611 bytes)
122. For NR0J (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Oct 6 08:14:22 1992; Bill, do you have an email connection? Scott K9MA sde@larry.sal.wisc.edu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00010.html (6,143 bytes)
123. CQWWDX-Country-File for CT ? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Oct 8 10:22:15 1992; I would also be interested in a current CQWW.CTY file. Scott K9MA sde@sal.wisc.edu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00013.html (6,524 bytes)
124. For NR0J (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Oct 6 08:14:22 1992; Bill, do you have an email connection? Scott K9MA sde@larry.sal.wisc.edu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00090.html (6,037 bytes)
125. CQWWDX-Country-File for CT ? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Oct 8 10:22:15 1992; I would also be interested in a current CQWW.CTY file. Scott K9MA sde@sal.wisc.edu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00092.html (6,458 bytes)
126. For NR0J (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Oct 6 08:14:22 1992; Bill, do you have an email connection? Scott K9MA sde@larry.sal.wisc.edu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00106.html (6,093 bytes)
127. CQWWDX-Country-File for CT ? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Oct 8 10:22:15 1992; I would also be interested in a current CQWW.CTY file. Scott K9MA sde@sal.wisc.edu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00108.html (6,452 bytes)
128. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 9 12:23:33 1992; I agree with Alan, I'll work ANYONE who answers my CQ. Lots of QRP stations had very good signals last weekend. Some of the really tough ones were in the "A" category, but really weak on backscatter.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00049.html (7,252 bytes)
129. EQUALISED DX Contest (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Nov 18 16:05:27 1992; I think the point of this whole discussion is that it would be interesting to have ONE contest that depended mostly on operating skill, instead of hardware and geography. There's no question that the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00113.html (7,654 bytes)
130. Equlized contest (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Nov 24 11:41:07 1992; With the end of the cold war, we were wondering what became of all the jamming transmitters. And here we thought the reason the UA's were getting louder was improving conditions! Thanks, Andy, for a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00152.html (6,433 bytes)
131. Better potatos... (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Nov 25 09:26:35 1992; No, no, Tree. You have it all wrong! It's those guys with the low antennas and big amplifiers that are putting all their RF into the garden instead of the ionosphere! 73, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00158.html (6,460 bytes)
132. K9MA CQWW CW Score (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 11:23:22 1992; Single operator, unassisted: Band QSO Z C 160 7 4 4 80 64 14 31 40 145 23 64 20 388 35 88 15 441 34 85 10 350 29 70 Tot 1393 139 342 1,913,418 (Rough, may not quite add up right yet.) Antennas: TH-7; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00175.html (6,641 bytes)
133. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:33:12 1992; It's hard to believe the bad coax switch was really hurting your rates that much. A 1 dB loss couldn't possibly affect your rates that much, but would have resulted in an average dissipation of 100 W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00184.html (6,862 bytes)
134. CT 7.13 (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:41:55 1992; I think I discovered a bug in mine this weekend. When I use the note pad, the note window appears only the first time after I load CT. After that, I can type in and store a note, but the window never; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00185.html (6,424 bytes)
135. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 9 12:23:33 1992; I agree with Alan, I'll work ANYONE who answers my CQ. Lots of QRP stations had very good signals last weekend. Some of the really tough ones were in the "A" category, but really weak on backscatter.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00194.html (7,227 bytes)
136. EQUALISED DX Contest (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Nov 18 16:05:27 1992; I think the point of this whole discussion is that it would be interesting to have ONE contest that depended mostly on operating skill, instead of hardware and geography. There's no question that the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00196.html (7,646 bytes)
137. Equlized contest (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Nov 24 11:41:07 1992; With the end of the cold war, we were wondering what became of all the jamming transmitters. And here we thought the reason the UA's were getting louder was improving conditions! Thanks, Andy, for a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00198.html (6,437 bytes)
138. Better potatos... (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Nov 25 09:26:35 1992; No, no, Tree. You have it all wrong! It's those guys with the low antennas and big amplifiers that are putting all their RF into the garden instead of the ionosphere! 73, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00199.html (6,467 bytes)
139. K9MA CQWW CW Score (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 11:23:22 1992; Single operator, unassisted: Band QSO Z C 160 7 4 4 80 64 14 31 40 145 23 64 20 388 35 88 15 441 34 85 10 350 29 70 Tot 1393 139 342 1,913,418 (Rough, may not quite add up right yet.) Antennas: TH-7; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00201.html (6,631 bytes)
140. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:33:12 1992; It's hard to believe the bad coax switch was really hurting your rates that much. A 1 dB loss couldn't possibly affect your rates that much, but would have resulted in an average dissipation of 100 W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00203.html (6,863 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]