Mail Archive Search: <+from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu: 198 ]

Total 198 documents matching your query.

161. New op on line - Cont'd (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 23 13:03:15 1992; Welcome to the Black Hole! 73 and Merry Xmas, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00232.html (6,549 bytes)
162. New topic to throw around... (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 23 15:20:14 1992; I agree with all Larry's comments on the packet generated pile-ups. Much of the trouble would go away if there were just some way to prevent anyone from calling before copying the callsign. Limiting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00239.html (8,317 bytes)
163. N2IC's "east coast" (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Dec 29 10:45:03 1992; Says KM9P: I may have worked 4 or 5 russian stations on 80 and none of them were over S-9. [In Western PA] If we ever hear an S-9 Russian station on 80 in Wisconsin, we'll let you all know. It does s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00258.html (7,491 bytes)
164. Oceania (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Dec 29 15:20:48 1992; The bands are empty down under, all right. In ZL, 80 meters is so empty every active ham can have his own private frequency. If you want to talk to ZL3WM, you just call him on his frequency. 73, Scot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00266.html (6,202 bytes)
165. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:14:56 1992; On the hot coax switch question, I suppose it's possible that the mismatch it introduced was detuning the amplifier so badly that only a fraction of the normal output was getting to the antenna(s). T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00281.html (6,955 bytes)
166. Multiplier question (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:18:32 1992; Is the penalty for a claiming multiplier which is then deleted by the judges greater than just the loss of the multiplier, assuming you made a valid contact? Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00282.html (6,674 bytes)
167. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:14:56 1992; On the hot coax switch question, I suppose it's possible that the mismatch it introduced was detuning the amplifier so badly that only a fraction of the normal output was getting to the antenna(s). T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00287.html (6,958 bytes)
168. Multiplier question (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:18:32 1992; Is the penalty for a claiming multiplier which is then deleted by the judges greater than just the loss of the multiplier, assuming you made a valid contact? Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00288.html (6,677 bytes)
169. XY3ABC/QRP (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Dec 3 11:29:28 1992; A couple times, a /QRP station made a point of REPEATING his call with the /QRP, when I responded with only his (correct) call. That wastes time twice! Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00292.html (6,152 bytes)
170. questionable multipliers (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Dec 3 16:25:18 1992; To: ERIC.L.SCACE@sprintintl.sprint.com I can see losing the QSO points, without further penalty, if the station worked is proven to be unlicensed. But what if I work a licensed operator, but claim th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00294.html (7,459 bytes)
171. 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Dec 7 12:33:42 1992; Yes, there were plenty of those alligators, all right. Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00298.html (6,261 bytes)
172. WKD B4 (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 9 09:14:33 1992; Certainly, the safe thing to do is to work the dupe, especially in a contest with a short exchange, and log it for zero points. Then, of course, don't delete it from your log. For any one of a number; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00302.html (7,801 bytes)
173. Mosley PRO-67B (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 9 13:53:22 1992; Does anyone have any experience with this antenna? If it works as well on 10-15-20 as the TH-7 and KT-34XA, it could be the solution for those of us with limited space who need some gain on 40, and m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00306.html (6,690 bytes)
174. WKD B4 (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 9 15:14:07 1992; Another reason to just work and log the dupes is the proliferation of similar calls: K3NA, K5NA, K3ZO, K9ZO, etc. With so many of the short callsigns in use by active contest operators, that's not su; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00307.html (7,374 bytes)
175. Why??? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Dec 11 09:57:14 1992; There's just no explaining these things. K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00310.html (6,104 bytes)
176. 10 M Score, K9MA (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Dec 14 14:54:06 1992; CW only, high power, unassisted, not a serious effort: 446 Q, 43 C, 46 S, 156K Points (This is rough, as my CT files don't seem to be working quite right.) 73, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00314.html (6,253 bytes)
177. Questions on Antennas (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Dec 18 14:40:05 1992; As far as I know, the consensus seems to be that there isn't too much difference in performance between the TH-7 and the KT34XA, in spite of the fact the the KT34XA has a longer boom. Perhaps others; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00318.html (6,800 bytes)
178. New op on line (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 23 11:03:57 1992; 73, Tim K3LR (No Western PA is not the east coast!) No, but it's about 20 dB closer than Wisconsin! 73, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00324.html (6,251 bytes)
179. New op on line - Cont'd (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 23 13:03:15 1992; Welcome to the Black Hole! 73 and Merry Xmas, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00325.html (6,540 bytes)
180. New topic to throw around... (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 23 15:20:14 1992; I agree with all Larry's comments on the packet generated pile-ups. Much of the trouble would go away if there were just some way to prevent anyone from calling before copying the callsign. Limiting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00327.html (8,303 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]