Mail Archive Search: <+from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu: 198 ]

Total 198 documents matching your query.

61. Antenna compromises (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Apr 9 10:19:16 1993; You don't say how far apart you are going to stack them, but my guess is that you wouldn't want any of the elements on adjacent antennas to be less than about 6 feet apart. Also, although I know lots; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00212.html (6,756 bytes)
62. 6 meter RFI Problems - HELP! (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Apr 16 10:25:23 1993; Concerning AA1AK's fellow ham's problems: For the cable TV TVI, first try wrapping both the power cord and the RF cable of the affected TV around ferrite cores. (Available at Radio Shack, etc.) A bal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00216.html (7,887 bytes)
63. Antenna compromises (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Apr 9 10:19:16 1993; You don't say how far apart you are going to stack them, but my guess is that you wouldn't want any of the elements on adjacent antennas to be less than about 6 feet apart. Also, although I know lots; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00227.html (6,758 bytes)
64. 6 meter RFI Problems - HELP! (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Apr 16 10:25:23 1993; Concerning AA1AK's fellow ham's problems: For the cable TV TVI, first try wrapping both the power cord and the RF cable of the affected TV around ferrite cores. (Available at Radio Shack, etc.) A bal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00231.html (7,851 bytes)
65. Best way-key amp frm 940? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 11 11:49:56 1993; Assuming the 940 has a 12 V PTT output on the xvtr jack as does the 930, you can use that to directly drive the gate of a MOSFET. (Use a resistor and a zener diode to protect the MOSFET gate, though.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00073.html (7,513 bytes)
66. How about this? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu May 13 10:45:28 1993; I'm all for lower power for domestic contests, but I'm not so sure about DX contests. I don't see any problem with lower power on the high bands, but it's possible that on 80 and 160 it would put som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00087.html (6,683 bytes)
67. 75 Ohm V's 50 Ohm (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri May 21 08:21:44 1993; It is probably not necessary to match the 75 Ohm cable if you can make its electrical length a multiple of a half wave on each band. The additional loss due to the SWR will be negligible, though ther; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00139.html (6,971 bytes)
68. Int Test (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon May 24 10:36:57 1993; There was also a "newd". I SWEAR I copied that right, even got a repeat to make sure! The only ethical thing to do was to pass it on, which I did. Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00161.html (6,203 bytes)
69. NEREK (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon May 24 10:39:33 1993; 105 Contacts, and my name never came back! (But there sure were a lot of "Steve's".) Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00162.html (6,120 bytes)
70. Lack of "Scott" in INT, . - -.-. (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 10:25:49 1993; Writes AA7NX: K5TA was my first contact, and I wondered if he started with his own name. So, we know what happened to the first Scott. Now, what happened to my name after I sent it to K5TA? I heard h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00172.html (7,928 bytes)
71. sprINT (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 10:43:28 1993; I agree with Alan, that two bands is probably optimal, especially since it's so easy for most to change bands without amplifiers. This time, the fact that all the activity was on 20 probably gave qui; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00173.html (6,494 bytes)
72. Lack of "Scott" in INT, . - -.-. (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 11:59:31 1993; Welcome to the "vanishing name" club, Kris. You're neither in my log, nor Trey's. What I want to know now is whether anyone actually started out with "Steve"? Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00175.html (7,527 bytes)
73. Best way-key amp frm 940? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 11 11:49:56 1993; Assuming the 940 has a 12 V PTT output on the xvtr jack as does the 930, you can use that to directly drive the gate of a MOSFET. (Use a resistor and a zener diode to protect the MOSFET gate, though.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00203.html (7,525 bytes)
74. How about this? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu May 13 10:45:28 1993; I'm all for lower power for domestic contests, but I'm not so sure about DX contests. I don't see any problem with lower power on the high bands, but it's possible that on 80 and 160 it would put som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00205.html (6,677 bytes)
75. 75 Ohm V's 50 Ohm (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri May 21 08:21:44 1993; It is probably not necessary to match the 75 Ohm cable if you can make its electrical length a multiple of a half wave on each band. The additional loss due to the SWR will be negligible, though ther; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00209.html (6,944 bytes)
76. Int Test (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon May 24 10:36:57 1993; There was also a "newd". I SWEAR I copied that right, even got a repeat to make sure! The only ethical thing to do was to pass it on, which I did. Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00210.html (6,137 bytes)
77. NEREK (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon May 24 10:39:33 1993; 105 Contacts, and my name never came back! (But there sure were a lot of "Steve's".) Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00211.html (6,116 bytes)
78. Lack of "Scott" in INT, . - -.-. (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 10:25:49 1993; Writes AA7NX: K5TA was my first contact, and I wondered if he started with his own name. So, we know what happened to the first Scott. Now, what happened to my name after I sent it to K5TA? I heard h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00213.html (7,914 bytes)
79. sprINT (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 10:43:28 1993; I agree with Alan, that two bands is probably optimal, especially since it's so easy for most to change bands without amplifiers. This time, the fact that all the activity was on 20 probably gave qui; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00214.html (6,455 bytes)
80. Lack of "Scott" in INT, . - -.-. (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 11:59:31 1993; Welcome to the "vanishing name" club, Kris. You're neither in my log, nor Trey's. What I want to know now is whether anyone actually started out with "Steve"? Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00215.html (7,529 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]