Mail Archive Search: <+from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu: 198 ]

Total 198 documents matching your query.

81. Best way-key amp frm 940? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 11 11:49:56 1993; Assuming the 940 has a 12 V PTT output on the xvtr jack as does the 930, you can use that to directly drive the gate of a MOSFET. (Use a resistor and a zener diode to protect the MOSFET gate, though.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00220.html (7,566 bytes)
82. How about this? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu May 13 10:45:28 1993; I'm all for lower power for domestic contests, but I'm not so sure about DX contests. I don't see any problem with lower power on the high bands, but it's possible that on 80 and 160 it would put som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00222.html (6,753 bytes)
83. 75 Ohm V's 50 Ohm (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri May 21 08:21:44 1993; It is probably not necessary to match the 75 Ohm cable if you can make its electrical length a multiple of a half wave on each band. The additional loss due to the SWR will be negligible, though ther; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00226.html (6,953 bytes)
84. Int Test (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon May 24 10:36:57 1993; There was also a "newd". I SWEAR I copied that right, even got a repeat to make sure! The only ethical thing to do was to pass it on, which I did. Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00227.html (6,163 bytes)
85. NEREK (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon May 24 10:39:33 1993; 105 Contacts, and my name never came back! (But there sure were a lot of "Steve's".) Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00228.html (6,130 bytes)
86. Lack of "Scott" in INT, . - -.-. (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 10:25:49 1993; Writes AA7NX: K5TA was my first contact, and I wondered if he started with his own name. So, we know what happened to the first Scott. Now, what happened to my name after I sent it to K5TA? I heard h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00230.html (7,874 bytes)
87. sprINT (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 10:43:28 1993; I agree with Alan, that two bands is probably optimal, especially since it's so easy for most to change bands without amplifiers. This time, the fact that all the activity was on 20 probably gave qui; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00231.html (6,498 bytes)
88. Lack of "Scott" in INT, . - -.-. (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue May 25 11:59:31 1993; Welcome to the "vanishing name" club, Kris. You're neither in my log, nor Trey's. What I want to know now is whether anyone actually started out with "Steve"? Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00232.html (7,492 bytes)
89. CQ's by too few stations (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Jun 9 09:16:45 1993; There's been lots of discussion here lately about how contests could be made more attractive to more operators, etc. I think we can all agree, big guns and casual operators alike, that more activity; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00034.html (8,069 bytes)
90. Rankings (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Jun 10 16:16:20 1993; Now, THERE'S something that would compensate for the East Coast advantage! Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00053.html (6,470 bytes)
91. CQs by too few stations (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Jun 11 10:39:22 1993; I agree with Eric that the CQ time limit probably wouldn't work. (It was just the first idea that occurred to me.) Eric is also correct that the real problem occurs when lots of loud stations are cal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00064.html (6,950 bytes)
92. QSY rule (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Jun 11 11:55:58 1993; While I agree that we shouldn't generally change rules in the big contests, especially in ways that make things more complicated, we do have to recognize that times are changing. What worked fine 20; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00066.html (6,748 bytes)
93. QSY and CQ (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Jun 11 14:32:49 1993; There really ISN'T room for everyone. That's the problem. It's much worse on phone, I'll agree, but it is sometimes pretty bad on cw, too. And that's only going to get worse as solar activity decline; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00071.html (6,596 bytes)
94. CQ's by too few stations (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Jun 9 09:16:45 1993; There's been lots of discussion here lately about how contests could be made more attractive to more operators, etc. I think we can all agree, big guns and casual operators alike, that more activity; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00168.html (8,103 bytes)
95. Rankings (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Jun 10 16:16:20 1993; Now, THERE'S something that would compensate for the East Coast advantage! Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00170.html (6,452 bytes)
96. CQs by too few stations (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Jun 11 10:39:22 1993; I agree with Eric that the CQ time limit probably wouldn't work. (It was just the first idea that occurred to me.) Eric is also correct that the real problem occurs when lots of loud stations are cal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00171.html (6,901 bytes)
97. QSY rule (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Jun 11 11:55:58 1993; While I agree that we shouldn't generally change rules in the big contests, especially in ways that make things more complicated, we do have to recognize that times are changing. What worked fine 20; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00172.html (6,728 bytes)
98. QSY and CQ (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Jun 11 14:32:49 1993; There really ISN'T room for everyone. That's the problem. It's much worse on phone, I'll agree, but it is sometimes pretty bad on cw, too. And that's only going to get worse as solar activity decline; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00174.html (6,582 bytes)
99. CQ's by too few stations (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Jun 9 09:16:45 1993; There's been lots of discussion here lately about how contests could be made more attractive to more operators, etc. I think we can all agree, big guns and casual operators alike, that more activity; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00184.html (8,145 bytes)
100. Rankings (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Jun 10 16:16:20 1993; Now, THERE'S something that would compensate for the East Coast advantage! Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00186.html (6,464 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]