Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shelbyk4ww@gmail.com: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Shelby Summerville <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:03:20 -0500
N2IC wrote: "Why not simply allow self spotting on SSB" I see no difference in self spotting than those that make a spot, only to find the spotting station there, instead of whom was spotted? 73, She
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00165.html (7,152 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] DQ and other (score: 1)
Author: Shelby Summerville <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 06:59:15 -0400
Instead of great gnashing of teeth, RTR! "*XIV. DECLARATION:* By submitting a CQ WPX Contest log, and in consideration of the efforts of the CQ WPX Contest Committee to review and evaluate that log,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00173.html (7,515 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Shelby Summerville <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:57:58 -0400
I have only "seriously" entered a few contests. When it becomes necessary for me to record my operation, especially if it's a "casual" operation, consider me a non participant. It seems to me that in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00291.html (11,772 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:20:08 -0400
Kindasorta reminds me of the news media, following a news conference! Telling me exactly what I heard, except in this case telling me exactly what I read. 73, Shelby -- 73, Shelby - K4WW As I don't h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00149.html (12,677 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 13:33:01 -0400
If all contests were the same, where would the interest be in that? I respect the fact that we are all entitled to our opinions. Checking my log I don't find N1UR on RTTY, and W2UP, not since 2004? I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00154.html (10,134 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:54:55 -0500
Why are so many putting so much emphasis on the CK, as anything more than a "randomly chosen two digit number that is consistently used throughout the contest", having absolutely no relation to anyth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00095.html (7,714 bytes)

7. [RTTY] KY QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:45:33 -0500
All are invited to participate, and enjoy the "not quite so serious" activity. Rules: http://www.wkdxa.com/mainsite/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=45:wkdxa&catid=35:kyqsorules&Itemid=56
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00111.html (6,747 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW SSB 2017 Effective DQ (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:43:22 -0500
Hers's another idea. Not requiring preregistration for those of us that provide the "casual" contacts for those that finish in the top 5, but, when it happens, value a certificate? I have binders ful
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-01/msg00232.html (9,876 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Certificates (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 08:17:59 -0400
N2RJ wrote: " For experienced contesters like myself and others, printed certificates really don't matter - we go for the big awards or even just our callsign in the results column. So for us we can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00049.html (7,266 bytes)

10. [WriteLog] KY QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 13:59:19 -0400
This coming weekend is the Kentucky QSO Party. We hope you will join us. Here is the link with more info: http://www.kyqsoparty.org/ A list of planned county activation's will be posted by Friday of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-05/msg00095.html (7,083 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getting dinged for the other guy bad copy. (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 10:28:21 -0400
I can't find where I've ever participated in RDXC. After reading rules, I can understand why. I have little interest in my score, but would give out some points, without keeping score, or submitting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00107.html (11,203 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] 40-2-CD (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:04:58 -0500
Anyone know of a supplier (MFG doesn't stock) for 2"X8", element to boom insulator, for 40-2-CD? If not, an alternative mounting solution? After "only" 32 years mine has disintegrated. To save band w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00260.html (6,559 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 07:38:41 -0400
"Judging is carried out only on the received LOGs = if a participant doesnt submit the log, then other participants will have no QSO point nor multiplier point credits for the QSOs with him!" As this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00039.html (7,939 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:23:20 -0500
If it is relatively certain that most "casual" operators don't read this list, why not make a list of the "offenders", then post contest, search for an email address, and contact them directly? If th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00070.html (10,658 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Please Explain This... (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:11:36 -0400
My version of N1MM has a CW reader. It's located between my ears -- 73, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-04/msg00089.html (10,141 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - Rules Changes Needed (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 14:41:50 -0400
If any change is warranted, IMHO, it would be to not allow assistance of any kind for all categories -- 73, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00018.html (11,301 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 16:04:03 -0400
https://t-rexsoftware.com/sedxc/100_watts_and_a_wire/index.htm "HF/VHF (non-WARC) bands 6-160M." What's the problem? -- 73, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00195.html (10,000 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Veterans Day (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 06:19:29 -0500
To all my fellow Veterans: Thank you for your service!! 73, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00125.html (6,445 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] RDXC (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:16:51 -0400
Anyone else that did NOT receive an email confirmation for RDXC log? 73, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-03/msg00082.html (6,413 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] 3830 (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 08:21:08 -0400
Anyone else have a problem logging into 3830 scores? 73, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-08/msg00010.html (6,298 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu