- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Multi-Single Rule (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger Huntley" <snr.huntley@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:02:23 +0000
- I wonder why the M/2 category is not similar, that being you can have three transmitters operating similar to M/1? There's only a disconnect if you choose to make this harder than it needs to be. Und
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00128.html (19,859 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] M/2 Rule (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger Huntley" <snr.huntley@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 03:13:39 +0000
- Under M/2 operation can you use a separate mult station (being transmitter No. 3) if that mult station does not operate at the same time as both of the two normal run stations? And if you can use the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00130.html (9,655 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] MS Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger Huntley" <snr.huntley@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:21:34 +0000
- The run station (0) is on 15 running and the mult station (1) is on 20 picking off mults. Both stations have been on their respective bands for over 10 minutes. My question is can the mult station (1
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00428.html (7,288 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu