Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:stan@aqity.org: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes -Automatic Fill - 93 or 67 (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:02:12 -0500
Looking at the log checking reports, I was surprised at the number of stations who apparently fill in the exchange information from a previous year's database. My son used my call in 2007 and his che
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00159.html (8,266 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes -Automatic Fill - 93 or 67 (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:38:26 -0500
Bob, I'm pretty sure if it did not matter to the ARRL that many might start sending 55, 88, 73 or some other easier to copy number instead of 67 or some other number which has to be repeated more oft
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00201.html (12,087 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Free Ticket- Contest Dinner (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:00:06 -0500
Posting for Friend who cannot attend: Free ticket to sold-out Contest Dinner at Dayton. Family emergency forces change in plans, so the ticket will be sent to the first one to respond to k0ro@arrl.ne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00122.html (7,557 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] License (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:44:43 -0500
Yuri, I would only assume that proof of licensing would be required if there was reasonable doubt that it did not exist. Based on the information in the article it sounded like the complaints from wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00044.html (8,928 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:07:11 -0500
I think one additional benefit of an option for a shorter time period would be the operating mode of the would be casual operator. I assume that many, operating for a few hours in a contest that cann
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00357.html (11,952 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:00:02 -0600
We are talking about a World Wide DX Contest where US and DX compete to see who can win the world. It is not a given that the winner is going to be from outside the USA. Do you believe the scoring s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00254.html (13,030 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:23:00 -0600
"I agree with Bob. I enjoy 160 a lot, but my setup is quite modest, and working any DX is a treat. The US covers a lot of geographical territory, and working the West Coast from Delaware can be a cho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00302.html (11,845 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu