Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steefpa3s@gmail.com: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Busted Reversed Beacon Network spots (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 09:07:32 +0200
This weekend I participated the WPX with a special call sing. And that was a big mistake. Because the skimmers don't know the call, they spotted me with a wrong call more times than you can believe.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00269.html (13,288 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the The Real Contesters International DX Contest. (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:25:48 +0200
And we call it the "Nova Zeelandia" contest :-) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00338.html (13,568 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Oh please, dont tackle me (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 07:24:26 +0200
This is the way to have a real big, bigger, biggest amplifier competition? Ore to have sponsors who are there just to prevent good runs for the competition? There are some (a tiny bit more power:-o )
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00364.html (9,089 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:01:19 +0200
@ N5IA -> +1 Maybe, just maybe, is has the feeling that remote antennas all over the world are not far away from remote operating? There are plenty of websdr antenna systems around, and using them se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00259.html (15,573 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Changes to the rules of the CQ WW (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:18:09 +0200
Hello all, As you perhaps know, there are some changes to the rules of the CQ WW. Or at least the way they are written down. In which now is stated that: "The CQ WW DX Contest Committee is responsibl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-08/msg00137.html (8,148 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Changes to the rules of the CQ WW (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:03:45 +0200
Hello all, I am sorry I wasn't clear! We are running a extreme low budget station. About 75% is made of stuff other trow away (trash) ore give away (semi trash)! My equipment is also low budget compa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-08/msg00149.html (13,070 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 1500 W output ... stop the limit :) (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:21:07 +0200
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00150.html (10,614 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] Presentation Randy K5ZD regarding the CQ WW @ PACC award ceremony (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:18:13 +0200
Presentation Randy K5ZD regarding the CQ WW @ PACC award ceremony on YouTube: http://youtu.be/xDaEyBOdMl8 73 Steef PA3S _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00196.html (6,915 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Running ID (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:50:18 +0100
Lets all ID every QSO! I do : http://youtu.be/7Up50zUUELE Then again, not realy big rare contest station :-) Or High Q rate :-) Have Fun !!!! 73 Steef PA3S 2013/11/1 Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00032.html (9,663 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW - Excessive Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:21:01 +0100
If you know/see that the station has a wide signal, and if its bothers you, dont work them! When you work a station /Q, you feel the station should be disqualified; still you work the station because
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00069.html (10,455 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] What rig to choose for a one-time fieldday MM setup? (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 13:45:35 +0100
The TS590 is "as bad as they come", on the "up conversion" bands. I have used it in the CQ WW multi radio environment on 10 while extreem conditions on 10 (2011?) and it is useless! No way you can ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00005.html (9,161 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] What rig to choose for a one-time fieldday MM setup? (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:37:13 +0100
No, 3 different NEW TS590 owned. In SO2R, next to a FT1000MP, and now SO2R FT1000MP and K3. I love the receiver on the TS590 in the down conversion, and the DNR on the TS590. Bud the up conversion ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00007.html (12,306 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] Dutch PACC contest (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 21:27:48 +0100
Pre-announcement of the PACC contest. VERON organizes the DUTCH PACC contest. EVERYONE who participates in the contest, and submits there log with a good address, will receive a ribbon. For all other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00019.html (7,301 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:04:50 +0100
I do SO2R and "dualing CQ" with MICROKEYER MK2R+. No problem in a low Q-rate PA. Especially in RTTY. 73 Steef PA3S _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00237.html (11,305 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu