Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:swca@swbell.net: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Re: [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Tue May 14 23:47:38 2002
likely Purely anecdotal, and maybe someone closer to the sitation can remind me of how the story really goes: I heard a story about some ops watching a thunderstorm approaching the old W7RM on the b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00152.html (8,325 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] Re: [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed May 15 11:44:15 2002
of approached Along with my completely unrelated W7RM story that's two for the good guys. Maybe I really heard the story from John and I am confused? Does ANYbody remember the W7RM anecdote? Mark, N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00163.html (8,047 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit dit (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed May 15 17:31:47 2002
one WAS is the operative word; this rule was officially abandoned some years ago. Mark, N5OT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00169.html (7,682 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] Dayton Parking question (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed May 15 17:33:28 2002
Any Cliff Notes versions of "the cheapest/best way to park if you have a car and are staying at the Crowne Plaza" for a Dayton Virgin? Mark, N5OT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00170.html (6,417 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Tim Duffy's arrival angle treatise (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Thu May 16 11:39:03 2002
Can somebody remind me what Tim Duffy's treatise on arrival angles was called? Mark, N5OT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00184.html (6,178 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] The ULTIMATE operating position (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Thu May 23 18:20:30 2002
Dang. I wish I'd had these pictures for my Dayton talk. :) Mark, N5OT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00294.html (7,048 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jun 5 22:32:30 2002
I think there is too much time at present between the event and the results. Reducing the time frame for log submission could contribute directly to shortening this time. I think it's a good idea. M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00068.html (8,886 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jun 5 22:36:11 2002
up, send What an absolutely great idea. The miracles of modern technology could be put to good use. Mark, N5OT That explains your bald spot... 73, Ward N0AX hour or so, it *did* keep my Bose phones
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00069.html (10,435 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jun 5 23:00:18 2002
KB3MM asks: The reason I rarely do that is because preparing the log is a tedious and time consuming process which is about the last thing I would want to do right after opeating a (long) contest. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00070.html (9,606 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Thu Jun 6 15:45:05 2002
KB3MM asked me: Here are a few examples: Let's say I switched bands on the radio but forgot to switch bands on the program. I think I owe it to everyone to go through and do all the ensuing damage co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00077.html (10,122 bytes)

31. [CQ-Contest] Quiet monitor, cheap (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Mon Jun 10 20:13:37 2002
Being a good contester, I decided to get TWO. I asked if I could get two rebates and they said "as long as I sent them in separately." After I had checked out, they THEN told me they have a "one reba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00124.html (6,990 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] "It's not a contest." (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Tue Jun 25 10:25:39 2002
I have NEVER understood this timeless Newington pronouncement. Somebody show me why accuracy and efficiency should not be rewarded, especially during an Emergency Preparedness Exercise. I know I'm p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00219.html (9,144 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] IARU Early-Bird submissions (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Fri Jul 12 11:50:05 2002
Hello everyone. I am going crazy here. I have looked and double-looked at posts about submitting early-bird logs for the WRTC/IARU, and at the WRTC web site, and nowhere can I find an email address t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00102.html (7,416 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] Thanks...? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Fri Jul 12 18:11:42 2002
All who responded are assuming that Early-Bird entries go to the same place as regular entries. Every response quoted the rules, which I quoted in my original email as well. IMO this is not clear, si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00110.html (6,691 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] WRTC glitches (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jul 17 10:33:53 2002
No effort was made to "provide similar transceivers," only antennas, supports and rotators. The competitors were required by the rules to provide their own radios. Likewise, they were required to pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00191.html (7,540 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] Ideas for WRTC 2004 (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jul 17 23:55:30 2002
Why does the WRTC need to be wedded to the IARU Radiosport? Mark, N5OT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00211.html (8,097 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] Why IARU? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Thu Jul 18 10:24:09 2002
I got a reply to my question "why does the WRTC need to be wedded to the IARU Radiosport?" which informed me it was important for the WRTC to be held during a contest in order to keep participation u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00222.html (7,881 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] World Champion (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Thu Jul 18 16:26:43 2002
I have gotten maybe 2x the number of comments direct to me that have been aired on cq-contest. I am beginning to see some basic stuff emerge from the replies. Everyone agrees (except me, I guess) tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00235.html (8,323 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] Unclear English alert continues (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Thu Jul 18 16:35:06 2002
On this very reflector not an hour ago: Can you make change for a $0.00?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00236.html (6,305 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jul 24 05:45:14 2002
Spilled milk. Yes, it is too bad. I would also have preferred the NCJ to have remained unaffiliated with the ARRL (I published it in the 70s). I was concerned we would lose a valuable non-ARRL-cente
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00385.html (9,268 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu