Before I did my usual speel I had wanted to see more breakdowns so I could better guess what I did wrong, but guess I will have to be content to use K5ZD (W2SC, opr) as a sole reference since that's
All is not lost, however! Now that you're on the Internet, why not take advantage of everything that's available here for free? You can get a lot of the scores from the various Web Pages that carry t
Here's my vote to keep it like it is. The WPX has been around for almost 40 years. I liked it when I was running a Viking II and a Trap Doublet in the black hole of Wisconsin as W9SZR, and I like it
My NCJ arrived yesterday (8 April) so be patient. Very 73, Fred Laun, K3ZO -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
My commentary on this year's CQ WPX CW Contest has been delayed due to seemingly endless efforts to clean up my paper files while adjusting to a new computer, a new printer, Windows 95, Office 97, et
K3ZO Comments re CQ 160 meter contest. In order to be different I decided to concentrate on the REF CW Contest this year, where I had 305 QSOs. Since it didn't start until 0600 GMT Saturday I played
Now that N3ADL has mentioned me in connection with this subject (Tks Doug!) I guess I better put in my two cents' worth. There is no question in my mind that contesters are better equipped to handle
Stan: I also provide my complaining neighbors with bullet-proof phones. But I don't just give phones away without proof that there is a problem. So far it has cost me two phones to one complaining ne
As usual I was in the single-operator all-band high-power category this year, unassisted (no packet or net). Just prior to the contest I thought I would have rotor problems, as the Tailtwister on the
I have been wanting to get in on this thread but have been a little tied up with correspondence and preparations for the ARRL Phone contest. Perhaps there aren't any secrets, in that contesters don't