Mail Archive Search: <+from:tad.danley@mail.nextel.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:tad.danley@mail.nextel.com: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Vanity Calls: (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Wed Jun 19 16:42:49 1996; Maybe that is why they are only issuing 4 new vanity calls per day! I was hoping it was because demand had tapered off, which would result in Gate 1A opening soon...and Gate 2 soon after... 73, Tad,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-06/msg00119.html (11,232 bytes)
2. Gate 1A Opens July 22! (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Fri Jun 21 13:49:39 1996; Per the June 21 issue of the FCC Daily Digest, the amateur station vanity call sign system filing Gate 1A opens July 22, 1996. 73, Tad, NZ3I I found the best way to check was to search on my new <old; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-06/msg00136.html (28,424 bytes)
3. Antenna article (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Thu Jul 25 16:43:58 1996; Haven't seen the article, but nobody has yet pointed out the problem with Statement #1 below. According to Walt Maxwell, W2DU, in his excellent book "REFLECTIONS, Transmission Lines and Antennas" the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-07/msg00106.html (13,140 bytes)
4. Gate 2 at LAST!! (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Thu Aug 22 12:44:47 1996; As usual, Ed, K4SB (and Shadow!) are correct! Per the August 22 issue of the FCC Daily Digest, the Amateur Station Vanity Call Sign System Filing Gate 2 opens September 23, 1996. This FCC Public Noti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00134.html (38,236 bytes)
5. Beta version of electronic 610-V (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Thu Sep 12 12:14:55 1996; Per the FCC Daily Digest dated today (September 12), an electronic beta test version of the 610-V form is available at the FCC web site at www.fcc.gov/wtb/amradsrv.html This is a beta version. At thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00055.html (28,591 bytes)
6. Signature Date on Contest 610V (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Fri Sep 20 10:16:24 1996; Jim: If you receive a call that I did not request, there should be no problem with dating the application with today's date. However, if you get a call that is higher on my list than the one I end up; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00102.html (10,369 bytes)
7. Signature Date on Contest 610V (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Fri Sep 20 10:34:56 1996; Jim: The best thing to do is use the date on which the application is prepared and signed. However, any date between when you received the form and the 23rd will be OK. Just don't date it the 24th! B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00103.html (13,196 bytes)
8. It pays to live in the Burgh (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Sat Sep 21 18:25:23 1996; Can the good doctor confirm or deny the rumor that the FCC will return any application received before 12:01 am on Monday, the official opening date for Gate 2?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00111.html (6,271 bytes)
9. Fcc and Vanity(delete if not interested) (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Mon Oct 7 19:37:34 1996; Apparently the FCC is not allowing vanity applications to disturb their "normal" work load: I have a friend who wants to get into CONTESTING and he passed his first ham test the evening of Friday, Se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00053.html (7,045 bytes)
10. oh-oh an OO! (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Sat Nov 9 13:09:58 1996; Dave: FCC Part 97.307 (emission standards) says, in part: (b) Emissions resulting from modulation must be confined to the band or segment available to the control operator... (d) The mean power of an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00126.html (7,456 bytes)
11. Re; Vanity calls QSLING (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Sun Nov 10 15:53:14 1996; That was in the original vanity rules, but was changed along the way long before Gate 1 opened. Now the wait is 2 years following license expiration, surrender, revocation, or death of the licensee.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00158.html (35,997 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]