The Top 200 claimed scores are up on the CQ magazine Web page. Look under info center, select contests and then select the CQ 160 Contests. Remember this is only the top 200 NOT all logs. 73 Dave K4J
Please make sure your output (to be submitted) is in the correct format. This is a major problem for all contest log checkers. The robots cannot find all the problems. If possible run your log thru a
The 2005 CQ 160 Claimed scores were posted on the CQ Magazine web page some time ago. Go to the web page select onfo center, then contests and awards. I only can get the top 200 scores for both modes
I have a big log from the 2005 CQ 160 CW contest that says TR Log POST 6.62. The log runs thru the log checker Ok but kicks out all USA and Canadian Contacts. After trying all my normal sources to co
I heard K0RF during the CQ WW SSB in 1979 while I was running single band 40. I listened to him at length then worked him to ask what was up. I had my Triton IV driving a Henry 3K to N4RJ's 2 el beam
Unusual propagation to Northern Europe has occurred for as long time. Roll the clock back to the CQ SSB Contest in 1970 (Now the WPX contest) and conditions were predicted to be stinko. Operating fro
What Steve, N2IC describes happens quite often even in the CQ 160 contests. 1. The log checking software will identify any most likely close call signs (probably several). 2. If the calls turns up in
The correct dates for the 2006 CW section are now posted on the CQ Magazine web page with the complete rules. After reaching the CQ web page go to Contests and select the CQ WW 160 Contest. The dates
The CQ 160 Contests are checked very closely. Much more so now than before e-logs. All e-logs are put in cabrillo format if not sent that way originally. Since so many try to jomebrew a cabrillo log
Its not too late to send your 2006 CQ 160 SSB log. I am keeping the robot open until Monday. I had Dink pull me a list in call sign order for the CQ 160 CW 3830 list and there are 42 stations on the
Ok gang, I was too harsh in my wording. We had some problems with the server for the robot and each contestant needs to read the messages from the robot to see if the log got in. I was missing 42 log
Hold on gang... The international elections group said the results for separation had to be at least 54 to 46 for. The final results are not being released until Mid June. The Elections group was not
I must agree with Bud, W2RU, that for most of us the thrill was seing out score in print. If W3XXX only worked 5 hours but made a substantial score we looked in the soapbox to see why. If K5XXX worke
Years ago there were rules about only allowing one call to be used by a station. There were also rules about operators of a station not being allowed to work the station. The first rule means that in
I entered the ARRL Phone SS in 1958 at the age of 14. In those days you had to choose between phone or CW. The first weekend (there were two) I ended up with 19 hours and about 120 QSOs behind my riv
I agree with Tree that although uniques are a part of every contest there is a limit to reasonableness. We do not want to penalize those who spend time, effort and dollars to build a superior station
The Top claimed scores for both CW and SSB are now on the CQ Magazine web page. Go to contests rules and then click on the CQ WW 160 Contest. Remember these are claimed scores. That is what you put i
I remember that a dozen years ago there was a welcome QSO party on 17. I worked Dave K6LL and several W6's. I do not remember what the exchange was just name and State as I recall. There was agreat u