I don't quite agree that you should always demand for you call repetition. For example: TEST ES5TV N1IK IK 5NN A5 N1IK 5NN 5 TU In that case I clearly say that I have got your call and I am sure abt
nice to have some clear views on this thing. Maybe Timo is right and this QSO is not legitimate though I don't see why Run station should give full call of the other station and S&P station does not
9000 Qs - well, sounds like a new world QSO record for SO 24 hours?:))) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
TUNED only effects 10 and 12m, so it is true MP lacks some sensitivity on 15m... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
I absolutely support the disclosure of all the logs and UBN reports as well. EU Sprint really stands out in that respect is just enjoying this advantage alone now. It would be highly educational and
well, I think it is quite hypothetical that some newcomers will actually get mocked because of the mistakes they made and will leave contesting because of that... Anyway, what we want mostly is to ha
Just one thing bothers me abit about the NILs. May the log checkers forgive me if I am not right but the times of the QSOs are not cross checked when similar calls are being searched in the logs in t
Well, of course Jose's calculation is just to illustrate the point and you could go much deeper into statistics making huge amount of extra assumptions and scientific calculations. And does not matte
In recent WPX I actually started to say "We've worked before, Roger?" I started to feel that it actually saves time compared to common thinking that just work them. That is due to the fact that actua
Unfortunately I have to agree that Steve is impossible to contact. I sent him numerous e-mails last year trying to get my 2003 WPX UBN report. No answer. I met him in CCF meeting in OH in January and
I did get an email yesterday from Steve with my 2004 SSB UBN! Jukka, OH6LI, was kind to forward my enquiries to Steve via Nokia internal email system. There seems to have been a problem with email fo
Hi contesters, ES OPEN HF Championship will take place this Saturday, April 16th, from 0500 to 0859 UTC on 40m and 80m! I hope you will have chance to participate in this nice small contest. There wi
seems an easy one for me: different call clearly and a valid new contact. 73 tonno es5tv -- Original Message -- From: <gissel@fh-ludwigshafen.de> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, Apri
I seriously doubt YT6A made those spots. They would have to be really plain stupid. Somebody from locals seems to have had fun trying to make them look cheaters. There is a spot from YU6ESC (op at YT
If you want to have a good laugh just look at the keyboard and see where those letters in the suffixes are! ONLY "G" and "J" in W5GJ don't touch each other - they have "H" in between:)))) God dammit,
Hi, I haven't done Multi Op in ARRL for some time thus looked at the rules today after a while. It was surpise for me that only 6 band changes are allowed for M/S. And there is no word about the seco
thanks guys for many prompt answers! ES5Q will be M/2! More fun for us and you;) Cu on bands! 73 tonno es5tv today multpliers transmitted signal at any given time. -- The world's top contesters battl
Which CQ pattern do you like to use in contest and which do you find most pleasant when working S&P? 1. TEST ES5TV ES5TV 2. ES5TV ES5TV TEST I have thought about it and tried both. We always have arg
Thanks for great answers guys! A lot of valuable suggestions really. Appears to be an interesting topic for many. For me it seems that (CQ) TEST CALL CALL is the way to go to please the majority:) CQ
4-5 years ago when I was just beginning to build my station and did not no much about antennas I was with great interest reading everything I could find from big guns' homepages in the web. Bill had