Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve2tzt@videotron.ca: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Popularity (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@videotron.ca>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:50:54 +0000
Those lists seem to indicate a rise of submited logs with the years. Does it mean a rise of participation ? Not sure, it may just be the result of internet and cabrillo format democratisation. To hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00096.html (7,807 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@videotron.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:33:54 -0400
I totally share the fears of Mike, I find the Xtreme category a very good idea, EXCEPT for the REMOTE RECEIVERS OUT OF THE COUNTRY rule. 1) This rule WILL DRIVE THE CQWW STRAIGHT AHEAD TO A VIRTUAL I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00189.html (12,518 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WAEDC CW: only for Extra class USA (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@videotron.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:15:06 -0400
If I have well understood, There are no reasons for us in NA to have transmitting frequencies above 7025kHz forbitten. Then, this rule could be an advantage for us, if EU stations are not allowed to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00247.html (9,621 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu