Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca: 166 ]

Total 166 documents matching your query.

141. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Wed Oct 1 19:44:13 1997
Except that then you may be stomping on Canadian and DX SSB ops. Either way, TX B4 RX will get you honours status at Lids U. 73, ve4xt -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Adm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00019.html (7,797 bytes)

142. [CQ-Contest] of lids and hypocrites (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sun Oct 5 18:22:46 1997
Anyone who heard W2NQ last year berating contesters' lack of operating ethics on the air will love this: Today, as I was playing in CQP, I tuned across 14.200 to hear a certain W2 calling a bunch of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00075.html (9,165 bytes)

143. [CQ-Contest] SS exchange (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sat Nov 8 21:56:38 1997
According to the rules as published in Oct. 1997 QST (can there be a better source?) the other station's callsign is not part of the required exchange; I quoth: ``4) Exchange: A consecutive serial nu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00196.html (8,097 bytes)

144. [CQ-Contest] SS, more thoughts (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sat Nov 8 22:01:15 1997
So, has anyone thought about the Year 2000 thing and how this will affect SS? Will we have to start sending 4-digit checks, or is this not a problem until the century is old enough that amateur radio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00197.html (7,184 bytes)

145. [CQ-Contest] SS exchange - clarification (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sat Nov 8 22:05:16 1997
K4OJ brought up an interesting point. My last posting should have included that omitting the other's call sign may not be the smartest thing to do if there's confusion about who's calling whom. -- CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00198.html (6,375 bytes)

146. [CQ-Contest] SS exchange (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sun Nov 9 18:54:49 1997
I'll admit to being a tad rusty on regs, but I seem to remember reading that the only requirement is to ID oneself. ID on the part of the other station is HIS responsibility. 73 k. -- CQ-Contest on W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00235.html (8,060 bytes)

147. [CQ-Contest] 160 Frequencies (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Wed Dec 3 08:58:11 1997
Has anyone tried a folded inverted L? If the folded theory holds for inverted Ls, this should improve bandwidth and perhaps make it easier to match. 73, kelly -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00055.html (6,679 bytes)

148. [CQ-Contest] K7RI, KH6J, K7QQ, K7BV, K9NS, W1YK (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sat Apr 6 20:25:23 2002
Hi, if you're one of these guys, I want to hear from you! I'm writing the QST report for 2001 ARRL SS Phone, and I need to talk (type) to you about your station and your effort. Please e-mail me at v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00077.html (6,425 bytes)

149. [CQ-Contest] Did you miss just one sect. in SS Phone? (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sat Apr 6 21:17:32 2002
Please tell me which one it was. Just doing a quick poll for a report on SS in QST. Thanks. Kelly ve4xt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00078.html (6,279 bytes)

150. [CQ-Contest] The ULTIMATE operating position (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Thu May 23 21:26:13 2002
Oh, great, now on Sunday afternoons on 15 we'll have 250kHz of snoring... Keep that VOX off, please. On the bright side, I guess having the run station nod off mid-Q is a great way to find a CQ frequ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00295.html (9,118 bytes)

151. [CQ-Contest] Please copy (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Wed Jun 26 21:04:11 2002
Hi, I guess this whole thread is preaching to the converted. I don't imagine too many ops who aren't at least casual contesters subscribe, so I'm not sure what the point of the thread is. Be that as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00259.html (7,396 bytes)

152. [CQ-Contest] Re: Why not complain about CQ also? (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Wed Jul 24 22:39:46 2002
Here's the thing: the people who won't bother to look at the line scores on the Web are the same people right now who don't bother to look at the line scores in QST. Line scores have limited appeal -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00413.html (13,310 bytes)

153. [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE BIG RUSH? (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sun Jul 28 11:24:01 2002
Heck of an idea! Perhaps the robot engineers could add a subroutine that compiles a mailing list from incoming e-mail submissions that could then be used (in late Oct. for SS, for example) to shotgun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00519.html (8,870 bytes)

154. [CQ-Contest] back to contesting? (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Tue Aug 6 23:19:27 2002
That would be a neat contest, though I wonder the extent to which you could convince ops whose stations aren't already equipped to do the digital modes. It is, of course, easier now with sound card a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00106.html (9,249 bytes)

155. [CQ-Contest] Re: What Is a Contact? (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Tue Aug 20 00:13:02 2002
At what point do we say enough with new rules? If we addressed every little gripe on this reflector with a new rule, contest announcements would be about as brief as War and Peace. The periodic repri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00199.html (12,447 bytes)

156. [CQ-Contest] The great Kenwood debate (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Fri Aug 30 21:35:01 2002
All this talk of the TS 570 vs. TS 850 (not even a contest in my book, in favour of the 850) raises a wider question: are ANY of Kenwood's current production radios competition grade? At the risk of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00334.html (7,587 bytes)

157. [CQ-Contest] QRZ in Austin, Tex. (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Fri Oct 11 21:41:03 2002
Hello all, I was in Austin earlier this month on business when we drove (north, I believe) out of the city past a 3M facility that had a tall windmill tower and several nice-looking HF and VHF antenn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00106.html (6,421 bytes)

158. [CQ-Contest] No DX in SS, please! (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sun Oct 13 07:00:53 2002
One of the things I love about SS is it is the great propagation equalizer. Sure, WP3R gets better prop than anybody, but SS is still a contest where you don't need to be somewhere along an ocean to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00114.html (6,922 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] Out of Band operating (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Wed Oct 30 19:05:13 2002
I can see it being mistakes, I can see it being some people trying to "slip one in." Any time that I've been CQing outside the U.S. phone bands and asked a U.S. caller if they were entitled to operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00259.html (10,795 bytes)

160. [CQ-Contest] W5WMU, WQ5L (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:57:37 -0500
Hi all, Has anyone heard how Pat or Ray, or any other cq-contest devotees, have made out with Katrina? I'm sure our thoughts are with anyone in the storm's path. 73, kelly ve4xt _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00457.html (6,356 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu