Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mts.net: 348 ]

Total 348 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] IC-706 vs. FT-857 (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:17:05 -0600
Hi all, I'm considering these two radios for portable contesting and backup at home (or primary if they outperform the 850). But the 706 presents a problem with the mics. My Heil won't work with the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00351.html (7,272 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] 2004 Phone SS (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 20:48:22 -0600
Hi all, Looking for interesting tales, amusing anecdotes or just plain funny stuff from the 2004 running of Phone SS. Please drop me a line if you think you have anything interesting to add. Looking
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00069.html (6,882 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Web cams QRV! (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:33:17 -0600
Well, nothing against the owners of the Webcams, but about the only thing one can learn from these images, perhaps, are tips for station layout. And in that vein, there doesn't seem to be anything pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00043.html (9,545 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 14:56:52 -0600
Hi all, FWIW, I think additional sprints are a great idea. And I also don't think that proponents of a CW sprint should be forced to also create and manage phone or RTTY contests. But if anyone wants
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00045.html (6,895 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] IC-746PRO -- evil incarnate or not? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:22:37 -0600
Hi all, Reviews of the 746PRO, even as late as two months ago, range from "best radio I've ever bought" (perhaps from someone coming out of an Eico 753) to "don't buy this radio if it's the last thin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00049.html (8,371 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real emergencies (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:11:18 -0600
Mal, I hope you aren't being serious. No regulator is going to propose that between the alternatives of someone's death or a brief, otherwise illegal communication, a person must instead die. If self
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00486.html (15,226 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] COMPARING APPLES TO BASKETBALLS - ARRLDX RULES (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:57:28 -0500
It seems Bob is merely talking about a distinction for reporting purposes, not in changing that ARRL DX is about the world working W and VE (almost like a QSO party for Canada and the U.S.). I don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00065.html (15,662 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX and foreign relations (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:38:37 -0500
Hi all, When KQ2M first proposed revised reporting for ARRL DX, delineating between W and VE, I didn't really see why VY2's advantages were any more compelling than any of the other advantages many o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00172.html (8,144 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Canada versus USA (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:12:11 -0500
There's no point in Canadians exploiting the phone allocation advantage on 40. All the S&P DX is by and large only listening above 7150 (for Americans listening 7040-7100), so CQs in 7050-7100 are pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00218.html (9,296 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:28:14 -0600
I have a solution that's probably easier to accomplish than changing contest dates. The U.S. should hold its Thanksgiving when we do - mid-October... 73, kelly ve4xt weekend contest debate little whi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00581.html (15,692 bytes)

31. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:38:47 -0600
Over the last several years, the Canadian government has spent billions of dollars creating the gun registry, believing that if all the guns in Canada are registered, gun-related crime will drop. Hmm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00011.html (13,549 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 06:22:48 -0600
In a private e-mail, a fellow invoked the spirit of W4KFC in arguing his point about mano-a-mano contesting, not trying to out-hardware the other. I find this recollection interesting if only for the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00012.html (7,365 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signing /QRP In Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 16:22:40 -0600
Here's what almost always happens to me copying a weak signal unnecessarily signing /QRP when S&Ping. me: ...VE4XT test QRP: K<static>3<static>/<static> me: K3? QRP: KB<static>A<static>/<static> me:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00285.html (12,818 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] More contesting tips and tricks (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 18:32:12 -0600
As much as I agree with the defensive measures suggested by Doug and Scott and do not dispute using them, I wonder: In football, an intercepted pass is considered a defensive coup. In soccer, a steal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00485.html (9,229 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:00:17 -0600
Funny how people have taken the response to this thread and exaggerated it into all sorts of nefarious behaviours. Nobody suggested not being sportsmanlike about it. Nobody said that ...K was an invi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00526.html (14,306 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:12:13 -0600
KG5U launched this into the ether: And don't forget confusing the heck out of operators who don't have Q5 copy on you and think there's actually something they need to log behind the slash. Just say
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00557.html (7,320 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:15:26 -0600
Hello all, Whenever the 'big antennas put me at a disadvantage on a city lot' argument comes up, I always think back to ops who have achieved incredible things from modest stations. VE4GV: Low-power
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00731.html (11,683 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] uniques (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 22:44:14 -0500
I'm confused. Which contests bust uniques? Can't seem to think of any, except maybe certain internet sprints that require both stations to send in a log before a Q counts, but that's a pretty boutiqu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00147.html (7,224 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Spam (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 23:05:58 -0500
Hi Ken, I'm not sure I'm as offended by this as you are. Spam is in the eye of the beholder: another spam-blocker, nude mud-wrestling pygmy site, or penile enhancement scam? Sure, that qualifies as s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00156.html (14,631 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] Re: Sending the wrong exchange (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mts.net (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Mon Mar 8 11:42:12 1999
Bravo. And what happens when a station is required by law to use different power levels, say on Top Band? And even if they decide to run more power than the law allows, ya think anyone's gonna admit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00118.html (8,497 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu