Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mts.net: 348 ]

Total 348 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rising IQ This Year (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:48:07 -0800
I don't think anyone advocates operators NOT giving their calls frequently, but it seems the traffic on this reflector is from those operators on the calling side of the pileup who are oh, so inconve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00144.html (17,702 bytes)

302. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rising IQ This Year (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:19:48 -0600
Kelly is right: there should be some ack to TTT before moving to K1AR. The point was to illustrate moving on to the next guy w/o opening up a general QRZ, since that's what the thread is about, not n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00154.html (10,694 bytes)

303. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rising IQ This Year (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:39:55 -0600
One of the MOST frustrating things I noticed at 6Y1V were all the times I'd send "DL4?" and a hundred guys, none of whom had DL4 in their calls, or even anything close, and were nowhere close to Germ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00167.html (23,094 bytes)

304. Re: [CQ-Contest] The dupes? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:51:24 -0600
I too at am a loss to follow the logic here. If you don't work him as a dupe and you did screw it up earlier in the log, you're still going to be penalized for that earlier screw-up. If you really di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00308.html (9,310 bytes)

305. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ contests results (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:04:11 -0600
logs, software to cross check and verify all data and calculate or recalculate the scores of all logs received. Why we still have to wait eleven months to know the definitive results? Because, comput
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00370.html (10,001 bytes)

306. [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:45:59 -0600
Hi all, Considering an amp to replace my homebrew 4-400s. I'd like something durable, not necessarily a California kilowatt and self-contained (no external HV PS). The more portable, the better. I ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00437.html (7,013 bytes)

307. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:47:48 -0600
My two cents: While I wouldn't like to see all contests make logs public, any more than I would want to see all contests adopt SS-like exchanges or all contests adopt QTCs or QSY rules or any of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00531.html (11,572 bytes)

308. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC web site (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:57:14 -0600
If this is something that makes someone "really angry," I'd suggest a little perspective is in order. I try not to let anything with ham radio affect my blood pressure. A hobby isn't worth it. 73, ke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00180.html (8,793 bytes)

309. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:23:21 -0600
Since you aren't bound by any rules unless you enter, you can't be DQ'd if you don't enter. Arguing for the preservation of the presumption of innocence is not tantamount to being guilty, either. Cho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00280.html (14,535 bytes)

310. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Re: CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs] (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:19:16 -0600
What if you held a protest and nobody knew? For any protest to have effect, there must be public knowledge of it or it gets swept under the rug. The whole point of a protest is to make a spectacle of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00286.html (9,051 bytes)

311. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:34:24 -0600
Hi all, I have some specific responses to Mike's question below: No. Sponsors want to receive as many logs as they can, from hard-core contesters AND casual contesters alike. Contests don't exist for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00102.html (15,002 bytes)

312. Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:09:35 -0500
Hi Mark, While it is something that has not, as far as I know, been adhered to as a standard, a look at the ARRL rules, at least, shows that a QSO only takes place when the callsigns and exchange inf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00176.html (12,138 bytes)

313. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do all contest participants need to follow the rules? (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:46:24 -0500
I think Mike is on-target. To me, the question this raises is: Does the existence of a contest grant to sponsors the right to control the behaviour of everybody on the band? To me, the answer is abso
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00311.html (10,515 bytes)

314. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:12:27 -0500
The problem becomes, however, when it's not clear cut: I am absolutely NOT going to interrogate any US ham that calls me between 14150 and 14200 to be sure they are extra class. Nor am I going to stu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00067.html (11,470 bytes)

315. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes -Automatic Fill - 93 or 67 (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:01:45 -0500
Hi all, The world does not need more rules, and this rule does not need to be clarified. There are many reasons that the check or section associated with a particular callsign may not be stable from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00171.html (10,729 bytes)

316. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pessimism (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:33:01 -0500
Hi David, It is a common mistake of new operators to assume that the conditions they experience are shared by everyone else. In K2-land, you are blessed with conditions that aren't as drastically aff
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00182.html (10,883 bytes)

317. [CQ-Contest] be careful what you wish for (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:23:52 -0500
To those who are demanding a literal interpretation of the rule regarding the check in SS: be careful what you wish for, you may get it. Consider this IS a rule that governs ARRL contests: 3. General
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00209.html (8,404 bytes)

318. Re: [CQ-Contest] License (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:26:49 -0500
Hi, Should this really come as a surprise? The rules do state that you agree that you have operated in accordance with the rules of the licensing authority that has jurisdiction, which in this case i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00041.html (8,678 bytes)

319. Re: [CQ-Contest] 7040 as lower limit (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 06:47:35 -0500
Hi all, Seems to me that quoting the IARU bandplan doesn't answer Doug's question, which was about which countries specify 7040 as a lower limit in law. The WPX rule says "strongly encouraged", but d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00065.html (10,558 bytes)

320. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band plans (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:28:40 -0500
These days, few countries regulate modes by frequency. Canadian amateurs can use any frequency on 40 for any mode. Band plans are not regulatory issues and most such band plans specifically state tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00096.html (9,430 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu