Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve5ra@sasktel.net: 197 ]

Total 197 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:27:27 -0600
Why not just work the stateside callers, signal report only, tell them this is a DX contest only, and then tell them they will not be in the log. Doug The train doesn't stop here anymore. ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00387.html (8,850 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SSB (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:11:39 -0600
Great, but will the station be allowed to officially submit a score before the reporting deadline? Doug I'll run the race and I will never be the same again. At the moment, the 6Y1V contest station h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00295.html (7,848 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:06:46 -0600
Mike, I get the same feeling that integrity is gone. Let me share an example from the last WPX test, although minor, shows a disturbing mindset. A very well known VE contester was running on 20m well
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00015.html (8,034 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:39:09 -0600
I got a number of personal responses basically telling me that the act of working US stations outside the US band should be an accepted practice. I believe that breaks the contest rules for any US st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00047.html (7,682 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] License (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:34:44 -0600
For the record, in past years, I operated in two ARRL contests from two different countries with a callsign that was requested by me and was VERBALLY granted by the licensing authorities. Of course I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00085.html (8,473 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] 59(9) all the time! (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:26:08 -0600
Amazing. Intelligent ham operators repeating the mindless, useless 59/599 over and over and ... Doug I'll run the race and I will never be the same again. --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounce
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00375.html (8,270 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections->Hijacked Thread (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:10:32 -0600
Marty, Well said, and it cancels any of Dave's flimsy subjective arguments. To Dave ... well you have lost, and to continue the argument to the level of silliness as you have done is a waste of time.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00275.html (12,373 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections - A Cheater Confesses (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:01:26 -0600
Let's throw this out for thought ... In my opinion I would say that more than 50% of contesters have cheated in a contest at one time or another. Cheated, operated outside the rule, either accidental
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00302.html (12,206 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Contest logging question: PE and PEI (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:10:11 -0600
Ken, That is not correct ... Canadian call signs DO NOT indicate the actual province and we DO NOT have to sign / if not in the call sign prefix province. Check the Canadian regulations. Doug/VA5DX I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00188.html (8,756 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:52:28 -0600
What drew me to amateur radio was the human factor. When that is gone then my station will QRT. True, 'advanced technology' will change amateur radio and it will never be the same again. It will draw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00175.html (9,235 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:06:44 -0600
"Where does that line get crossed?" asks Kelly Taylor. The song from the sixties, In the Year 2525, opens with the words "In the year 2525, If man is still alive, If woman can survive, They may find.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00234.html (10,716 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:39:51 -0600
Correction, I forgot one important piece. In the year 2025 You won't need no radio You won't need no amplifier You won't need no antennas You won't need no operator Some machine is doing that for you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00246.html (8,748 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ???? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:29:37 -0600
You are correct ... you can not regulate what non-participants do in a contest. However I am confused on what effect you feel non-participants have on the results of a contest. If they don't particip
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00195.html (11,238 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ???? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:44:17 -0600
So you meant to say 'You can not regulate what CASUAL OPERATORS do in a contest.' If you are a non-participant you obviously do not operate in the contest. Wrong choice of words on your part. Doug I'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00200.html (10,211 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:19:43 -0600
Yes Paul you are so correct. Amateur radio contesting is becoming internet contesting and amateur radio DXing is becoming internet DXing. Jim, N6TJ, advice to the children falls on deaf ears as the P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00313.html (8,727 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] 599 (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:32:20 -0600
Al, The simple answer is that some people can not break stupid habits. You will get some excuses why the 599 is still there, but the bottom line is that it is a mindless, useless exchange. Doug I'll
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00406.html (8,245 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] Unclaimed Assistance (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:52:51 -0600
Does unclaimed assistance for these QRP stations also mean that they were running high power? Doug Seven DQ's As CQ WW Continues Tough Checks On Cheating; Top QRP Score By DK8ZB Tossed Out By Jamie D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00407.html (11,512 bytes)

78. [CQ-Contest] DXCC Applications (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:34:15 -0600
Just a note re a reply I received from Bill Moore. If you don't see your callsign in the DXCC Applications Received list it is because they have a backlog to log in. They are at least one week behind
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00198.html (6,978 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callign in exchange (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:31:13 -0600
How does one find out if the rule is being ignored by the rule maker? Do rule makers post a message saying that this and that rule will be ignored because it is not enforced? Doug "Those Island days
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00171.html (8,089 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best SS exchange yet! (score: 1)
Author: Doug <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:21:38 -0600
I used to hold the callsign VE5RA. RA - Ruptured Appendix, and the best Radio America. Doug "Those Island days are always on my mind, Someday soon I'm going to leave it all behind." _________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00449.html (9,656 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu