Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:vk7gn@bigpond.com: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Secrets of contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:51:35 +1100
I'm confused , why all the angst about non ID.. I ID after every qso over 95% of the time. If I don't ID I don't want anyone who doesn't already know who I am to call! If I you cannot wait for the ne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00003.html (9,087 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Contest Invitations (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:22:46 +1000
We get on here many invitations to join in contests. I suggest that when writing these you include this basic information. * Exchange required (report, zone, serial number etc) * Dates * Times * Any
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-07/msg00143.html (7,226 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] What cost and expected benefit tocompete? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:09:35 +1000
This thread started from complaints from some about slow certificates and slow results and no net available scores. So, as a solution, a fee has been proposed. It will not work because some of us wil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00278.html (7,957 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Scoring in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:14:19 +1100
There seems to be a basic problem with most of the analysis pro and con 1 pt for USA internal QSO's. It assumes that it doesn't change the operating strategies and practices within the contest. Just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00829.html (8,478 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] New contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:18:04 +1100
Over the yearsI have attempted to introduce new hams to contesting. Recently I have found a new problem. They do not just need to learn about logging, pile up techniques etc they have to learn how to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00115.html (9,046 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:04:25 +1100
It is far easier to work from PA0 to DL1 and receive 2 points than it is for a W0 to work a W6 on 80m...whats the logic in the former and not at least give the latter 1 point??? It is far easier to w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00002.html (7,266 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted Low Power? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:30:01 +1100
Jamie, No-one is discriminating against you except you, yourself. If you choose to operate a category in which you believe you will not win that is your choice, not mine, not anyone elses, yours! Non
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00595.html (8,718 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Contest Announcements (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:35:26 +1100
Can I please make another request that when advertising your contest on this reflector you include the required exchange, start and end times and dates. I am more than happy to hand out a few QSO's t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00681.html (7,335 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Move WPX Back to 30 Hours? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:32:34 +1100
The only thing that has made me really angry in contesting was the decision to go from 30 to 36 hours in WPX. It was a change which was lobbied for by a tiny minority of contesters who already had an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00595.html (21,206 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts from a sponsor on one hour log deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 08:16:58 +1000
Hi Marty, You need to get a global perspective - even in advanced countries like Australia internet is not universal and even then outside major cities not much choice. We call a beer from a can a "t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00255.html (10,114 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SN...has to be a better way! (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:59:35 +1000
With lousy conditions I prefer to keep repeating until you are sure. I agree with Bob's comment on full numbers are better in bad conditions. I do not like the other station sending my report back an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00389.html (11,534 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Skimmers etc (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:31:56 +1000
"It is tiresome when individuals attempt to selectively block the advancement of technology out of prejudice and fear." I'm not sure how you respond to "straw man" arguments like this one. I am certa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00023.html (10,174 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Very Slight Type Corrected- S/O and S/O (A) (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:12:58 +1000
I wonder if we moved away from the idea of assistance and returned the single op class to a limited set of permitted equipment and technology and made the Assisted class into an open class where anyt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00067.html (7,922 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers etc (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:59:16 +1000
John, I though like that prior to Internet spotting. There is no fun in being spotted in Europe when your signal into Europe is not good enough to control the mob. The skimmer will make that worse. P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00076.html (8,619 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:39:26 +1000
--Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Robert Chudek - K0RC Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 5:22 AM To: Ron Notarius W3WN;
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00301.html (10,584 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] KH6 is a Mult but not a Mult (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:04:20 +1000
Now I am all for moving KH6 into North America - get them out of Oceania:-)!!! Martin VK7GN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00195.html (7,591 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is this for real? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:23:37 +1100
Yuri, Quite likely - VP2E, was the most audible station on 20 from our location at the far side of the world. Quite loud and often there when the band to that area was not great - was he using vertic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00296.html (7,957 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rising IQ This Year (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:53:53 +1100
Yea! I gave up on an 80m pile that was not hearing me well enough to allow any control. Most of those calling had never listened or even heard me at all. Just an automatic jump from the computer. I c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00054.html (11,022 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now! (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:32:52 +1100
It's time we took the fight back. What basis do 25 amateurs have for claiming ownership of 3655 or any other frequency for that matter. Amateur radio is not and should not be chanelised (other than b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00263.html (10,355 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Contest History (score: 1)
Author: Martin Luther <vk7gn@bigpond.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:13:47 +1000
Hi Doug WB2VYA August 1981 CQ Magazine P.26 "Working the CQ WW Contest - a potpourri covering ......" ".... operating an efficient multi-single" Anybody needing a copy I'll scan it for them Martin VK
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00403.html (7,087 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu