Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 1003 ]

Total 1003 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:19:02 -0700
I want my own category so I can win every time. I could have the best station in the world and lose because of a better op....There are just a few :-) Band conditions will have a huge effect. I can u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00747.html (15,584 bytes)

22. RE: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:01:53 -0700
So I guess with this logic if you are able to transmit to an antenna on a 100ft tower you should be in a different class than the guy with a dipole and a guy with a 200 ft tower? Why is SO2R being si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00753.html (11,580 bytes)

23. RE: [CQ-Contest] Contesting tips and tricks - not (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:08:21 -0700
Can someone point me to the run frequency reservation page? I would like 2.5 kc's from the band edge for each contest. As far as I am concerned as soon as you stop using the frequency it is available
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00481.html (12,634 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:05:30 -0700
I just received this email. How would you respond? I don't know if this person was in the contest or not. Name removed for privacy. "I 'm going through my logs from the November Phone SS, and I have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00494.html (8,182 bytes)

25. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:41:25 -0700
Yes unfortunately you can go to the log received page and find out where section the log was submitted for. Me thinks the ARRL should not provide this information. Mike W0MU And what is to stop the g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00533.html (9,527 bytes)

26. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:01:16 -0700
I emailed a reply stating that I would be happy to provide the information after the log deadline and that it was outside the rules for me to provide it at this time. He was not the only one that had
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00537.html (9,038 bytes)

27. RE: [CQ-Contest] K3EST (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:00:39 -0700
Sounds like sour grapes to me. Did you even attempt to contact K3EST like the A61 group did? I believe that you can get separate callsigns in D44 or sign /D44? Apparently this is not possible in A61.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00575.html (8,285 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] Phone Sprint Team Needed (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU-Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:59:35 -0600
I will also be on Flares permitting from Montana. This will be my first Sprint in a while and will be the first contest using the FTDX-9000. Let the buyer beware. Not sure which call to use: W0MU or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00174.html (6,680 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cluster Practices (score: 1)
Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 21:01:04 -0600
Bill I have to agree, the Can't hear them spots actually helped here too. I can't recall such odd propagation ever as a ham. Generally the pacific from Colorado is like shooting fish in a barrel. Not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00066.html (9,326 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] D4B QRT (score: 1)
Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 07:00:57 -0600
In my 20 some years as a ham, I have seen the hobby, not only in contesting, lose much of it's integrity. Maybe there is a new world definition integrity today? Are we not alienating cheaters because
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00069.html (11,735 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cluster Practices (score: 1)
Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:23:11 -0600
Then don't use the cluster and listen for the station yourself. If everyone waited for their alarms to go off, nobody would be tuning the bands. How did we ever work a rare one 25 yrs ago with out pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00077.html (12,000 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] D4B QRT (score: 1)
Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 07:02:23 -0600
How about the participants demanding that the sponsors of the contest enforce the rules! Maybe some new blood in some of the advisory committees? W0MU Congrats to Al on his accomplishments. I'd liken
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00103.html (8,071 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest recording (score: 1)
Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:51:49 -0600
Actually it is just the time the recording is on not by the QSO. The program just runs in the background. In Sweepstakes last year I used a program called Audacity. I don't recall exactly how much sp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00188.html (8,227 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] Creative Labs Sound Blaster Live 24 bit cards (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU-Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:25:59 -0600
This new card does not have multiple inputs! It shares one line-in/mic-in jack. If you are interfacing with a rigblaster and you need a line-in and mic-in you are out of luck! Walmart is only carryin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00210.html (7,090 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: w0mu@w0mu.com
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:02:12 -0500
Has the issue been brought to the attention of rules committee? Without solid proof, the claims made have little value and appear to be a witch hunt, IMHO. The mere act of spotting a station on the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00244.html (10,164 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Live audio during WW Phone (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:32:29 -0600
If the op is wasting time listening to some internet radio he is not making contacts! I applaud the effort to allow us to listen in on a top notch station. It will allow many a chance to experience a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00560.html (9,556 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Live audio during WW Phone (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:58:59 -0600
Define use. The remote station is not in control of the receiver and has no knowledge of the frequency in use. --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00562.html (11,742 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:29:24 -0700
You could always filter out the packet spots that you don't want...i.e. SSB. Just because you can hear an European 40 over doesn't mean that everyone else can. Those using contest logging programs ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00651.html (9,108 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] A phonetic that's tough to beat (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 07:55:02 -0700
Cmom I would love that call... Wubya zed zero zed qr zed! You don't necessarily have to use homonyms or other weird phonetics to come up with a doozie. My favorite using standard phonetics, is that o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00231.html (8,077 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 08:32:22 -0700
The point is there is a choice. You can choose to use packet or not. Nobody is forcing anyone to use it. You have the same choice with rigs, antennas, logging programs etc. You choose the technology
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00236.html (13,302 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu