Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0yk@msn.com: 221 ]

Total 221 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] ARRL SSB DX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:03:07 -0700
I thought you were against pre-fill (another one of your threads). So, you really don't copy 59 and then type it in your log? How are CA and CALIFORNIA more "consistent" than K and KILOWATT? Why can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00213.html (10,619 bytes)

62. [RTTY] RTTY Contest Dinner at Visalia (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:11:18 -0700
Jeff, WK6I, and I invite anyone interested to join us for dinner at Fugazzi's Restaurant in Visalia on Saturday evening, 26 April, at 7pm during the International DX Convention. You'll have to pay fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00221.html (7,109 bytes)

63. [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint Logs Due Sunday 04Z (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:43:40 -0700
Remember to submit your RTTY Sprint log prior to the deadline at 04Z, Sunday (Saturday night NA). Logs can be uploaded at http://www.ncjweb.com/sprintlogsubmit.php. 64 logs have been received so far.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00335.html (6,952 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Move WPX Back to 30 Hours? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:51:13 -0700
Operating WPX RTTY SOHP as P49X always ends long before the rate drops off. However, that's a poor reason for increasing the SO time period to 36 hours like CW and SSB are now. For all the rationale
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00519.html (12,142 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and 30 Hour Nonsense (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:05:51 -0700
So, I guess the NA Sprints should be extended to 48 hours by this argument? Heck, why not a full 7-day week and we can see who the real contesters are. Or, at least go back to the old ARRL DX Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00568.html (12,421 bytes)

66. [RTTY] March 2008 Preliminary NA RTTY Sprint Results Posted (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:29:42 -0700
Preliminary results are now posted for the NA RTTY Sprint of two weeks ago at http://www.ncjweb.com/sprintrttyprelim.php. Official results and article will appear in the May/June NCJ which is about t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00658.html (7,228 bytes)

67. [RTTY] Logging Software for NA RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:21:44 -0700
Win-Test, N1MM Logger and WriteLog all support the NA RTTY Sprint with its "legal dupe" rule that allows multiple contacts with the same station on the same band as long as there are three intervenin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00692.html (7,077 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:34:19 -0700
K5ZD replied to N4ZR: Agree. What exactly is "classic"? CW readers, CW keyers, software logging, automatic band switching, SO2R technology, etc. are "classic", but local skimmer is not? What's the di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00278.html (15,583 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:52:16 -0700
History files don't relieve the operator from COPYING the exchange. They MAY relieve the operator from TYPING the exchange if what he copies matches what the history file pre-fills for him. 73, Ed -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00381.html (10,265 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer musings (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:08:59 -0700
Hopefully, all of us who feel compelled to "transmit" our opinions and emotions about skimmer will take some time out to "receive". I've found Ward's few, but thoughtful, postings on the topic to be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00497.html (15,531 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer"are there? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:22:49 -0700
Jimk8mr@aol.com responds: I disagree that an audio file should be required. == What is your rationale, Jim? Thanks, Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00580.html (7,553 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Got K3? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 07:53:39 -0700
There are daily posts on the Elecraft reflector by people receiving their K3s. The latest postings are by people who ordered in late November 2007 and the serial numbers are in the mid-800s. There a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00068.html (7,844 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:39:04 -0700
I suggest two enhancements to Kelly's wording: 1. "receipt" should be replaced by "receipt and usage", because one has no control over another station coming on the run frequency and volunteering tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00288.html (19,084 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Top Ten scores & 3830 postings? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:44:59 -0700
For several years, the NCJ NA CW Sprint has been log-checked with results posted 14 days after the contest. Three years ago, the same turn-around began on the RTTY Sprint. Seven days to submit logs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00307.html (9,901 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH6 is a Mult but not a Mult (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:17:23 -0700
BZZZZ! Busted name ... you lose the post and get a penalty no more posting for three years. Common sense is to leave contest rules alone after significant history exists, which it does on both NAQP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00194.html (8,375 bytes)

76. [RTTY] CQWW RTTY Practice (score: 1)
Author: "J. Edward \(Ed\) Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:09:42 -0700
Let's practice for 30 minutes on Thursday night to check out our stations for CQWW RTTY this weekend. Actually, let's do 30-minute practices to accommodate Europe better. The first one is more conven
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00256.html (7,322 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW RTTY Practice (score: 1)
Author: "J. Edward \(Ed\) Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:40:50 -0700
US/VE stations send RST, Zone and QTH. All others send RST and Zone. For example: K7QQ: WW DE K7QQ K7QQ CQ P49X: DE P49X K7QQ: P49X 599 03 WA P49X: K7QQ 599 09 K7QQ: TU DE K7QQ CQ 73, Ed - P49X (W0YK
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00261.html (11,291 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW RTTY Practice (score: 1)
Author: "J. Edward \(Ed\) Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:54:36 -0700
Yeah, you're right, of course. I've had too much sun stringing Beverage feedlines and fixing antennas ... not thinking clearly. My brain fade calculated 10pm local in Europe, moving the clock the wr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00265.html (7,683 bytes)

79. [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint This Saturday (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:51:29 -0700
The Fall running of the NCJ NA RTTY Sprint is this Saturday (00-04Z Sunday). Plan to join the fun for four hours. This is the first RTTY Sprint without the "legal dupe" rule, so its just like CW and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00047.html (7,655 bytes)

80. [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint Practice Friday (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:52:34 -0700
NCCC is sponsoring a 30-minute practice for the NCJ NA RTTY Sprint this Friday evening NA time, at 0230-0300 UTC Saturday. Standard Sprint rules (the old RTTY legal dupe rule is gone) on 20, 40 and 8
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00053.html (6,967 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu