Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w1md@cfl.rr.com: 85 ]

Total 85 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [FCG] 10 conditions two weeks ago (score: 1)
Author: "Marty Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 22:10:27 -0500
What's even more frustrating George is that the #'s indicate this should have been a 'decent' weekend...or at least as good as CW WW... Need more folks to get on and Transmit and fewer to look at the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00111.html (8,384 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Public Access to logs (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:19:49 -0500
So Ron, By the logic of your comment below, couldn't someone just as easily just "listen" on the air, copy a few calls that VP6DX worked (to give him/her a range to validate his claim) and then submi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00053.html (13,486 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hunting in Africa (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:22:10 -0400
So if I'm sitting in W7 land operating that neat remote station in VP5...with a VP5 callsign who am I competing against...other Carib stations...no advantage there...in fact I'd rather be sitting in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00474.html (14,101 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Does the KCDXC still do the pileup contest at Dayton? (score: 1)
Author: "Marty Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:10:36 -0400
Suite!!!! W1MD --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Trey Garlough Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 10:57 AM To: cq-contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00557.html (9,093 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re; Skimmer Ultimate Setup (score: 1)
Author: "Marty Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:11:40 -0400
I think I hear the new contest category now... Single Op skimmer Otherwise known as... S O S... W1MD I think most of us "grumpy old men" (is Sophia Loren around here somewhere?) would agree with that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00583.html (9,850 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPXSSB More 30 hour NONSENSE (score: 1)
Author: "Marty Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:16:53 -0400
Second Trey's sentiments... SOSB15 from PJ2T in 2004....tough to fill 36 hours with limited propagation... SOAB from PJ2T in 2006....again tough to fill 36 hours with limited propagation... 30 hours
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00612.html (10,055 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Searchable Online CQ Archive Complete (score: 1)
Author: "Marty Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:46:16 -0400
Ah the irony... Previous Page Next Page -->Year: 1981 ->Month: October ->Page: 029 (PDF) | Low Res [switch to High Res (better quality)] Sorry, page 29 is not available to demo users. Only pages 1 th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00675.html (10,346 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts from a sponsor on one hour log deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "Marty Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 21:44:42 -0400
All true...but how many ham's do NOT have more than one e-mail account? I'm willing to bet most everyone has hotmail, yahoo, or gmail as well as a more 'standard' ISP. And in all the years that I've
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00249.html (12,583 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] rules (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:06:42 -0400
But if "Skimmer" was part of the "Assisted" category then your "unassisted" record wouldn't be affected...or did I miss something in the translation? I'm assuming your 10m SBSO effort was of the unas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00124.html (8,857 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] rules (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:36:29 -0400
Hi Bill, Understand and agree. My premise was that skimmer would be lumped in as assisted. Frankly I think skimmer would be a big advantage over packet in that it is id'ing only those stations HEARD
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00133.html (9,401 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - Putting it in perspective (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:52:20 -0400
Some of you may have seen this(these) video(s)...if you can forgive the non-contest bent...I think you will 'see' the bigger picture... ...then again, maybe not...some are just "shiftless"... :) SHIF
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00287.html (11,369 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Why have different classes at all? (score: 1)
Author: "Marty Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:32:49 -0400
I guess it depends on "how" the user uses SCP. I use it to 'guide' the guess...in other words I can look at the list and see AA4CR AA4LR and I've copied AA4?R...I'll try the first one looking for a R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00436.html (9,609 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3830 (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:33:49 -0400
Ah, here it comes... QSL'ing is 'the final courtesy' of a contact on the air so everyone must (should) QSL...even a contest QSO...which arguably is not a QSO at all but a simple exchange of data (W1M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00069.html (10,093 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:10:23 -0400
Hmmm... So "you" would rather stay in the dark ie. competitors positions in real time vs. having an unofficial, "voluntary", after contest posting that should be madatory? At least for the participan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00100.html (24,382 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Anyone hear a status on Jody VP5JM? Ike looks to have been bad there. (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 11:33:27 -0400
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00126.html (6,664 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH6 is a Mult but not a Mult (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:32:35 -0400
Aw geeze...gotta get that political jab in there... :) Could be worse... we could all be trying to figure out what the 57 states were... Ok...now we're even... No more politics please... ____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00192.html (8,631 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing 2009 CQWW 160 contest (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:14:42 -0400
Sleep?? :) W1MD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00118.html (10,090 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] arrl nov ss ssb TODAY! (score: 1)
Author: "Marty Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:40:56 -0500
Yep...getting cool here too...only 82 degrees out today. May have to get the sweater out. Bad Antenna weather...shorts and a tee-shirt. :( <grin> Good luck to all... W1MD/4 --Original Message-- From:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00248.html (9,784 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] [YCCC] Windows XP Pro OR Vista? (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:52:27 -0500
Check out Best Buy...they (the one in my area at least) have a new e-Machine that is a small form factor and XP Pro...for $250. They have figured out that Microsoft Virus (Vista) is not on everyone's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00230.html (9,737 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:52:41 -0500
Well... CW Skimmer will effectively nullify that 'concern'...for CW contests anyway. If you are in the carib and can hear other carib stations...setup CW Skimmer and you can monitor the competition (
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00537.html (12,057 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu