Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2nra@optonline.net: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] 2006 WAE CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores Question (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:10:06 -0400
Hi, In the All 3830 Claimed Scores posting I see EU entries where QTCs exceed QSOs. I also see non-EU entries where QTCs equal QSOs. Given this rule: Each QSO may only be reported once as a QTC. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00262.html (7,441 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WAE CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores Question (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:32:14 -0400
Now I get it. I see how EUs can get so many QTCs. And I see how non-EUs could have QSOs = QTCs. Obviously the one non-EU with more QTCs is an error. I see some missed out on all of the fun with no QT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00278.html (7,617 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW and portable operations (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:25:02 -0400
Hi Don, You also have to get a certificate for the callsign/M if you used /M. 73 Art W2NRA After a couple inquiries, I have learned that you can QSL these contacts correctly through LoTW. In TQSL, cr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00036.html (18,059 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Value of Spotting Networks (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:15:34 -0500
Hi Paul, I don't think you understand how modern contest software works. Working the CQWW CQ consists of the following: 1. Hit Control plus down arrow Keys (tunes radio to next spot on bandmap) 2. En
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00815.html (8,432 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Value of Spotting Networks (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:53:56 -0500
Hi Paul You wrote: "If you're just jumping . . ." What do you mean me? I don't do this! I'm was just making the point that you could do this. I get enough UBNs due to my poor antennas and weak receiv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00844.html (9,132 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Value of Spotting Networks (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:57:52 -0500
Hi Dave, You are, of course, right. But fortunately this is not unfortunate! 73 Art W2NRA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00846.html (7,652 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] Quality of Sound Cards? (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:44:33 -0500
Hi Eric, The M-Audio Delta 44 is a great sound card. However it does lack a mixer and mic preamp. That makes it difficult to configure Digital Voice Keying and soundcard output levels. Your purpose,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00088.html (7,828 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 66, Issue 17 (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:15:52 -0400
"impatient S&P guy"? And I suppose the S&P guy is supposed to PATIENTLY wait until the Run guy CQs again. Not! It is obvious that if a Run guy hears a ditty-dumb-dumb-ditty after a CQ, the S&P guy ei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00189.html (8,208 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] and now for something completely different (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:53:04 -0500
Since I haven't achieved success, I guess I'm expressing my #1 excuse for not achieving success. I have to agree with Tony. Not enough BitC time. 73, from a Sixburgh fan (since '70s) in New York 73
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00047.html (8,100 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Percentage (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:02:44 -0500
The percentages I'm seeing here seem low. If I count from when I became active again, Nov 2002, after a long layoff (back to 1997) my percentage is 46.4% (6,752 LotW QSLs out of 14,523 QSOs). QSOs br
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00445.html (8,509 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu