Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2up@comcast.net: 333 ]

Total 333 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:16:36 -0700
Seems like the tail wagging the dog. Barry W2UP There are techniques for maximizing the odds of getting spotted by a skimmer, and for minimizing the skimmer busting your call: Send CQ TEST and YOURCA
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00398.html (8,086 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:35:10 -0700
On a positive note, skimmer is NOT posting that very prolific 2x0 callsign from the Ivory Coast - TU. Probably not necessary as station TU signs that callsign almost every QSO. Once in a while, he si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00422.html (10,876 bytes)

103. [CQ-Contest] Keep your CTY files updated (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:57:58 -0700
I hate post a non-skimmer topic, but... :-) Just reviewed by CQWW SSB UBN report. 16 stations I worked lost points for "miscopying" my zone as 5, rather than 4. For those of you who like to keep manu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00542.html (7,143 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:29:22 -0700
On one hand, yes it would be interesting. On the other hand, there are so many categories as it is. Barry W2UP Randy, K5ZD --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00107.html (12,834 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL is not my favourite (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 07:22:17 -0700
Do all contests need to be the same? Variety is the spice of life. There are drawbacks in every contest. For example, how dumb is it to work a Zero point QSO to get a mult (and not be certain that yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00120.html (9,240 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:27:25 -0700
My invitation said it was sent to those who submitted a log. If you submitted a log and didn't get one, you're not paranoid; they really are out to get you :-) Barry W2UP The survey is to collect opi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00188.html (11,454 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX Contest Survey (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:10:24 -0600
Does that mean one person can submit the survey multiple times? Barry W2UP Dear Contester, The CQ WW DX Contest Committee invites you to take a short survey to share your feedback on the contest. You
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00212.html (8,898 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:50:41 -0600
I refused to operate the contest sponsored by Romeo, which included last 4 of the SSN + mother's maiden name in the exchange. :-) Barry W2UP I guess we have gone over this before, but I still don't s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00237.html (18,249 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] Love my operating chair (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:56:53 -0600
First, chairs. I'll sweat by the Herman Miller Aeron. Got one about 10 years ago. Prior to that, would switch off between 2 or 3 different chairs and even stand for a while. Next, neck. Steve, perhap
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00287.html (16,436 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] KILLING THE GOLDEN GOOSE (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 11:04:48 -0600
I guess if K5GO, W0UA and you already know the answers, there is no point in doing the survey and soliciting thousands or opinions. BTW, the WAE hasn't been the same without you... :-) Barry W2UP On
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00357.html (14,542 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] A puzzle (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:32:45 -0600
Perhaps we need to have our contest schedule based on the lunar calendar? Barry W2UP Here is a list of dates over 500 years http://www.census.gov/srd/www/genhol/easter500freq.html Easter can happen a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00533.html (9,650 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Paper log one radio, the SO2R and the SDR generatio (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:35:55 -0600
50 years ago, you couldn't wear your shack on your belt. 50 years ago, it required some effort to get a ham license. 50 years ago was before the instant gratification age. Barry W2UP We are the gener
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00534.html (8,640 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many hours do SOAB entrants actually operate? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:45:21 -0600
I only did (almost) full-time when cndx were good and I was in the mood to try to win the category. If the contest was 36h, I surely would have put more full-time efforts into it. Barry W2UP How many
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00598.html (12,117 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] Poisson d'Avril ? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:47:49 -0600
Aren't they the same person and one of those calls is a contest club call? :-) Barry W2UP -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00158.html (8,909 bytes)

115. [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:42:34 -0600
I tried some remote operation in the 10m contest using a TS480 and Remoterig. The radio control worked fine, but we had lots of problems with dropped dits, timing problems, etc. on CW, presumably due
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00195.html (7,411 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:44:13 -0600
Paul, Perhaps where you live, antennas aren't being legislated out of existence. In the US, unless one lives in an old neghbo(u)rhood, without restrictive covenants and homeowner's associations, or i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00252.html (12,020 bytes)

117. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:40:45 -0600
I had to check the cover of QST for the month. I thought that was an April Fool's article. Barry W2UP It's here already. QST for May 2013 includes a review of RemoteHamRadio, with subscriptions runni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00302.html (11,530 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] On Distance Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 21:10:55 -0600
If a QSO has 0 point value, it should not have to be worked for mult credit. Barry W2UP On 5/9/2013 20:52, Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote: 1. There is certainly a lot of inequity in the current 1-2-3 point, c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00096.html (9,808 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 21:15:06 -0600
I was there. Randy said a number of guys were winding up with negative scores. That certainly doesn't encourage long term participation by newbies. Barry W2UP While I agree that the leniency on buste
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00213.html (11,303 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza 2014 (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 17:05:55 -0600
Like the Hara arena, I think the Crowne Plaza has deteriorated over the years. I'll stay elsewhere next time. Barry W2UP 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00291.html (11,423 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu