Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2up@comcast.net: 333 ]

Total 333 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 07:20:10 -0600
Hans - you have to copy the exchange yourself.  That requires much skill, especially in CQWW  :-) Barry W2UP So in CQWW (is that a major?) you can use a local skimmer to decode CW, but you cant use a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00049.html (11,048 bytes)

322. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 11:20:30 -0600
OK, I stand corrected.  CW decoders are prohibited in CQWW single op. Barry W2UP On 5/4/2019 6:50 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote: W2UP writes: CW decoders are strictly prohibited in the majors. I don't know of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00054.html (9,740 bytes)

323. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 18:49:49 -0600
Is that why 15% of the QSOs in the last ARRL DX and CQWW I operated with my callsign got the state/zone wrong? Hint - they let N1MM pre-fill and didn't copy the exchange. Barry W2UP 73, de Hans, KØHB
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00061.html (12,581 bytes)

324. Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic Contesting for CW and SSB - Forget FT4 (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 07:11:12 -0600
Our menu has changed.  Please listen carefully.  Your QSO may be recorded for quality assurance. Press 1 for a repeat callsign, press 2 for your signal report, press 3 for the zone or state, marque o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00067.html (14,682 bytes)

325. Re: [CQ-Contest] e: Fwd: [wsjtgroup] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc6 (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:37:15 -0600
Frank - You're older than you look  :-) Barry W2UP http://time.com/4307892/samuel-morse-telegraph-histor y 73 Frank W3LPL _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00027.html (8,004 bytes)

326. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 *is* a contesting mode. Was: WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc6 (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 07:28:31 -0600
Why bother with RF?  Just move it to the internet.  You can't hear it, anyway. Barry W2UP I wish I could enlighten anybody, some would really benefit, I think. LOL If FT4 contesting succeeds, it will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00032.html (10,363 bytes)

327. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where did "Reflector" come from? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:18:26 -0600
When in doubt google or wikipedia it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_mailing_list Looking back, do any of you greybeards out there remember where the name "reflector" came from? I much pref
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00077.html (8,296 bytes)

328. [CQ-Contest] onslaught of spam via my arrl.net email address (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:00:55 -0600
In the last few days, I've gotten a ton of spam sent to my callsign at arrl.net.  Anybody else getting this?  Should I contact someone at arrl about this? Barry W2UP _________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00127.html (6,695 bytes)

329. Re: [CQ-Contest] onslaught of spam via my arrl.net email address (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 05:40:29 -0600
I emailed the League, at Ria's suggestion via PM, and got this response: Dear Barry: I am sorry to hear your .net email has been targeted and understand how aggravating this can be. However, the reas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00138.html (12,656 bytes)

330. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40M FT4 Frequency (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 06:49:12 -0600
Your post should have been titled, "What you can hear can hurt you."  :-) Barry W2UP On 8/5/2019 1:57 AM, Jim Brown wrote: 7047 has been chosen, and many fans of WSJT modes have observed that it's li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00015.html (7,893 bytes)

331. Re: [CQ-Contest] Impressive demonstration of one dB of signal strength improvement (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:55:25 -0600
Regardless of speed, it always seems the fade/QRN is synchronized with the callsign and you miss the same letters each time  :-) Barry W2UP Faster would attempt to catch short fades whereas slower wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00148.html (14,040 bytes)

332. Re: [CQ-Contest] Room Reservations for Dayton 2020 at the CrownePlaza hotel in downtown Dayton (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:18:57 -0600
Jim, In today's economy, at least where I live (Denver), unemployment is about 2%, anyone who wants a job can find one.  there are help wanted signs everywhere.  Maybe it's different in Ohio, but her
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-09/msg00090.html (15,117 bytes)

333. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:24:47 -0700
Didn't this already exist in the 70s?  You could claim DXCC credit for contest QSOs if confirmed in both logs? Barry W2UP google the subject line. of this message. -- K1TN ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00057.html (8,645 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu