Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2up@comcast.net: 333 ]

Total 333 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Can't believe I missed this section! (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:41:07 -0700
I can top LAX. I missed SFL! They must have all been out for the earlybird specials... Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00144.html (8,337 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:53:00 -0700
The rules aren't broken, so why "fix" them? Only some ignorant or smart-a** ops are. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00187.html (7,757 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best SS exchange yet! (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:29:46 -0700
Along similar lines, many years ago I was the log checker for the NY QSO Party. I was floored when I started looking at logs and saw many people logged the copied RST as 5NN. Barry, <insert call> --
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00381.html (9,516 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] Will there be judges at the top contenders' sites this year? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:24:41 -0700
Just wondering if there will be live monitoring going on this year. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00423.html (6,928 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend..... (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:27:01 -0700
I usually call the guy, then before giving a report, send CALL? It usually works. Once in a while I'll get a TU. if he logged me, without me sending a report and without me knowing his call, he'll be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00522.html (11,717 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend.... (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:09:06 -0700
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it's OK for a single-op (unassisted) to post spots, but not receive them. IIRC, CT has this functionality built in. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00027.html (7,978 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] How often do you do a LOTW upload? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:38:56 -0700
Did an upload today and about 1/3 of my 10m contest QSOs are already QSLed - significantly higher than I expected. I usually do an upload shortly after a contest with a significant number of QSOs. Ho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00213.html (7,117 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 07:20:37 -0700
Let's take it a step further - any contests that break up YU, NU, adnNWT into separate mutls should also include Mexcian states as mults. Then next, does Belize have states? :.) Barry W2UP __________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00404.html (9,566 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 17:51:43 -0700
TOO is not a cut number or abbreviation. It's your RTTY decoder missing the SHIFT character prior to sending the report. Don't forget, even though you're typing in ASCII, Baudot is a 5 bit code and t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00031.html (11,890 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:48:49 -0700
Do CW contesters stay below 060? The problems include the number of signals in the contest and on 40m, the different allocations in R1 and R3. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO __________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00042.html (9,530 bytes)

51. [CQ-Contest] More busted calls in RBN than human spots? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:38:23 -0700
Got my first taste of the RBN at K0RF this weekend. Maybe K1TTT can do an analysis, but it seemed that the Skimmer missed lots of dits at the beginning of calls, as well as picking up stray letters.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00238.html (7,223 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC Antenna on a single tower for the contester? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:16:51 -0600
Hi Tim, I had a similar setup when I lived on the east coast. I talked with the antenna mfrs at Dayton, then modeled it, too and the WARC antenna really messed up the pattern on the high bands. Being
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00171.html (11,387 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] Grid square is a dumb exchange (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:13:43 -0600
My first time on 6m this weekend, just playing around in the contest. On a band with such spotty propagation, it would be nice to know the QTH of the stations being worked. Short of keeping a grid sq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00039.html (6,745 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on Proposed Changes to ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:54:50 -0600
OTOH, it's nice that guys can operate from the Caribb or Central America and have an even shot with charmed locations with point advantages like P4. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO ____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00105.html (9,970 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the Playing Field (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:47:23 -0600
Distance-based scoring is no fairer than the present system. It does not take into account difference in N-S locations. For example, OH and SM may be the same distance as Italy from a given spot in W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00160.html (9,471 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the playing field (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:53:44 -0600
One thing nobody has mentioned as a possible cause for the drop in activity in ARRL DX is removal of the full write-up and scores from QST. I guess we need room for more articles on how to QSL and wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00161.html (8,194 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] engineering talent needed (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:06:25 -0600
-- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00249.html (8,372 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking for a station in Washington DC (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:04:51 -0600
Kill two birds with one stone - get a free antenna and be in a competitive area for ARRL DX :.) Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00110.html (9,905 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:19:05 -0600
I'd like to see Multiops prohibited from the bottom 25 KHz of a band :.) Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00150.html (9,603 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] 100 Watt power limit for Sprints-Discuss (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:28:27 -0600
Less cheating? Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00134.html (7,881 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu