Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w4ef@dellroy.com: 167 ]

Total 167 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] THE DAWG! (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Thu Apr 3 19:56:08 2003
Chuck, you really hit the nail on the head. I used to listen to and occasionally chat with WA4D back in the mid-80's when he was active on the HF bands. Mike, got all of his mileage from the people w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00104.html (10,944 bytes)

62. [CQ-Contest] DX Box Scores in ARRL 160 Meter Contest (was RE:ARRL 160 Meter Scores?) (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Sun May 25 12:18:10 2003
Seems like the better tradeoff would be to delete a paragraph of text and add in a box for the DX guys instead deleting the QRP people. Adding some incentive for the DX folks would be a good thing. B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00242.html (13,097 bytes)

63. [TowerTalk] Reminder - Deadline for Comments on Broadband Over Powerline NOI (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 05:44:19 -0700
Fellow Reflectorites: Just a quick reminder that the deadline for filing comments in response to the FCC's Notice of Inquiry on Broadband over Powerline (BPL) is this coming MONDAY JULY 7, 2003. If y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00000.html (9,451 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] Reminder - Deadline for Comments on Broadband Over Powerline NOI (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Fri Jul 4 10:45:11 2003
Fellow CQ-Contest Reflectorites: Just a quick reminder that the deadline for filing comments in response to the FCC's Notice of Inquiry on Broadband over Powerline (BPL) is this coming MONDAY JULY 7,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00059.html (8,423 bytes)

65. [CQ-Contest] Re: FCC Comments on BPL - Dupes! (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Mon Jul 7 11:29:45 2003
Yes, I noticed the same thing, Jim. WA6MME told me he was getting an error message when he tried to post, but when I checked the ECFS his comments where in there. And here I thought that the ECFS wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00089.html (8,122 bytes)

66. [CQ-Contest] Re: SCOURGES OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER 3 (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Thu Jul 10 13:04:24 2003
Tell me more about this QRT Class, Kelly. It sounds like something I could actually win! Elmer Fudd (aka W4EF).................................
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00126.html (8,776 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: AstroAlert: Middle Latitude Auroral ActivityWATCH is Active (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Sat Jul 12 12:17:42 2003
Yeah, and 3 nights ago, the K index was 1 for the first time in weeks. All the Euros were real loud here in W6 on 20 and 17 meters even with my dummy load antennas at the home QTH (trapped vertical a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00149.html (7,252 bytes)

68. [CQ-Contest] David Clark H10-40 Headset (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Fri Jul 18 06:07:11 2003
Has anyone had any luck getting decent audio from the stock electret microphone element in the David Clark H10-40 Headset? I got decent audio from mine using my Ten-Tec Paragon, but when I tried it w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00197.html (6,710 bytes)

69. [CQ-Contest] David Clark H10-40 Headset (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Sat Jul 19 01:37:07 2003
Mike, You can get the mic jacks from the RF connection: http://www.therfc.com/micconn.htm The 3/16PJ Drake/Collins Mic Jack is the one you want. I mounted the jack in a small plastic case along with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00204.html (9,774 bytes)

70. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Mon Jul 21 23:08:54 2003
Kelly, I think taping a contest is perfectly fine as long as one doesn't replay the tape until after the log is turned in. Although I have never done it, I think it would be interesting to go back an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00224.html (7,997 bytes)

71. [CQ-Contest] Contesting from the basement (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Wed Jul 23 11:54:02 2003
That's funny when I told a friend that I was thinking of running 8/3 or 6/3 to my shack, he scoffed and asked why I was bothering with such small wire. He recommened that I go with at least #1AWG co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00253.html (8,834 bytes)

72. [CQ-Contest] Licensing Changes (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Fri Jul 25 11:04:14 2003
Its too bad that the FCC jumped the gun with the 5 wpm extra class. With the new international regs eliminating the CW requirement on HF, I think a good compromise would be to eliminate the CW requir
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00299.html (10,804 bytes)

73. [CQ-Contest] Rohn Going SK? (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Fri Jul 25 11:56:58 2003
That's not really Rohn, Jeff. Its Michael Landa at Landa and Associates. No real connection as far as I can tell (Landa is in the surplus and used tower business). Mike, W4EF................... http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00301.html (13,154 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Thu Aug 7 12:35:24 2003
I think what would be helpful to everyone, is if each person stated his QSLing policy on his QRZ.COM listing. If you require greenbacks instead of IRCs, if you QSL only via the buro, if you don't ans
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00159.html (9,151 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Anyone notice?? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:32:54 -0700
The story on the L.A. times website this morning mentioned that Nathan was a "ham radio enthusiast". 73 de Mike, W4EF.................... -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00277.html (9,930 bytes)

76. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about CQWW rules (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:57:17 -0700
I don't think that is correct. While it is true that according to DXCC rules that you can get DXCC credit for contacts made by a guest operator who is using your call at your station, it is not true
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00289.html (12,286 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Geo-Magnetic Storm (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:24:02 -0700
Check out: http://hfradio.org/propagation.html Mike, W4EF.............. -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00308.html (8,950 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: M/Ms Annoying? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:40:57 -0800
Ed, that is not correct. I think you are mixing up LSB and USB. A USB signal with the suppressed carrier at 21200.5 KHz would be legal so long as the opposite sideband rejection of the stations trans
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00376.html (10,778 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] NW7US Propagation Bulletin - 28-X-2003 - 1900Z (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 02:56:04 -0800
Yes, and faking two Jupiter sized "naked-eye" sunspots wouldn't exactly be trivial either. I think I'd rather fake a moon landing :):) Mike, W4EF........................... -- The world's top contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00406.html (8,962 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW: Asking for Precedence (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 06:56:37 -0800
This happens sometimes when someone sends the number back to me followed by a ? (like in Pete's "472?" example), but the QRM/QRN takes them out, so I am not sure if they sent "471?", "472?", or "480?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00074.html (8,744 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu