Mail Archive Search: <+from:w5td@lcisp.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w5td@lcisp.com: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:15:09 -0000; Hi Bob, The Ten Tec Orion, Icom 7800 and Yaesu FTDX9000 series also have true dual receive. The FT1000 model did if you added the BPF-1 unit, which was standard in the FT1000D 73s John W5TD (ex NE0P); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00122.html (8,905 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:00:56 -0000; The FTDX9000 does 73s John W5TD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00133.html (8,873 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:07:17 -0000; THere used to be a 0 land QSO party, sponsored for awhile by the Davenport (Iowa) Radio Amateur Club-I was contest chair for a year back during High School days. I think the last certificate I got fo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00146.html (8,544 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:11:11 -0000; ALthough the Oklahoma QSO party is growing in popularity since being revived a couple of years ago. Iowa doesn't even have a QSO party anymore although they tried one in the mid 80s. 73s John W5TD (e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00147.html (8,875 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 03:17:09 -0000; I couldn't agree more. But remember, the only way to attract new people into ham radio and contesting is to completely remove our standards....er, make licensing easier. 73s John W5TD _______________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00160.html (9,471 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:41:52 -0000; Probably because most new hams are elmered (including the ARRL) into getting onto 2 meter FM and maybe APRS. And many get their licenses today solely for the public service aspect of it, and have no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00170.html (10,061 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 02:56:25 -0000; Also remember that the QST numbers for both the FT1000MP and FT1000MP MKV were at a 20khz spacing, which is really pretty useless for evaluating receiver performance, especially for a contest environ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00004.html (9,925 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Icom 736 receiver (score: 1): Author: "John" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:04:13 -0500; What is the receiver like on the Icom 736, and how well is it at handling noise? Would it be a big step up from an Icom 706 in terms of performance and handling different types of noise? 73s John W5T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00263.html (6,777 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:09:33 -0000; Hi Mark, A couple of questions here: 1. I don't quite follow you. You say you didn't get a Field because they are no longer available, because they have been replaced with the FT2000. Then you buy a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00083.html (13,316 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Icom 706MKII or Kenwood TS690? (score: 1): Author: "John" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:48:19 -0500; I currently have an Icom 706MKII which I picked up recently, and it is doing a decent job on HF and 6, other than the receiver overloading at times in the IARU contest, and the SSB audio being kind o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00088.html (8,176 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:59:13 -0000; Hi Mark, OK, got you now. I did have a FT1000MP for a little while, and it was a nice radio also. I am sure that the FT1000 is even better. Would like to try a TS850 sometime, but won't fit in the st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00098.html (17,517 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]