Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5vx@hiline.net: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Board Meeting? (score: 1)
Author: w5vx@hiline.net (Bill Parry)
Date: Sun Jan 20 21:30:43 2002
Now that the ARRL board meeting is over. I'm curious about the process used in gathering input from members regarding changes at the ARRL. One current issue concerned contest scores, among other thin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00402.html (6,933 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:23:41 -0500
Bill, et al, I thought this issue had died. I hadn't heard much regarding LOTW lately. It seems to me that interest sorta waxes and wanes with the big contests. After I put my 1600 Qs from IARU, it i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00406.html (12,740 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [CTDXCC] N3BB IARU SOAB CW (Long Comments) (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:07:39 -0500
Howdy Jim, Congrats on the great score. I enjoyed the breakdowns that you provided and I decided I would include mine. It appears that the bands we were on and the ups and downs in the rate seem to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00785.html (11,514 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:23:41 -0500
Bill, et al, I thought this issue had died. I hadn't heard much regarding LOTW lately. It seems to me that interest sorta waxes and wanes with the big contests. After I put my 1600 Qs from IARU, it i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00995.html (12,740 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 09:18:43 -0500
I, too, was pleased to see the ZD8 qsls (80 - 10) pop up on the LOTW this weekend. Although 80 and 160 are lagging behind, I am either over or very near DXCC on the other bands. I have notice several
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00013.html (8,471 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40M "Woodpecker" (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:28:12 -0500
I was on 40 CW (7003) this morning from about 1045Z - 1120Z. The "Woodpecker" signal began during this time. I checked and it peaked at 320 degrees and was very loud, 599+ here in S. Texas. When I t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00231.html (8,971 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] A different OTR/ (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:14:51 -0500
We had been discussing a signal at my local sunrise 7.000 - 7.015 and it appeared to be coming from possibly the BY area. From the discussion it appeared that we might have had more than one. This ev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00249.html (7,462 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] A little LoTW gotcha (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:11:52 -0600
I was reading this thread and was trying to figure out how I remembered to renew my certificate back in December. I looked back and realized that there was a reminder on the "Logbook User's Home Page
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00110.html (12,164 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete LoTW QSL Records, Worthless ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:34:56 -0600
I wanted to reemphasize Bob's point. I think that LOTW is going to be a great help in keeping records. Unfortunately, I was an offending station, in that I reversed my CQ zone and ITU zone when I mad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00117.html (9,367 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:28:24 -0600
I really like contests to fall on holiday weekends, in particular Thanksgiving! At least I used to before I retired. Many have to work on Friday nights and/or weekends and cannot get loose for contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00587.html (9,611 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] awesome upgrades to the 8 band vertical!! (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:28:53 -0500
Or better still, Cut and tune your inverted vee half way between phone and cw. Place a 1/4 wave piece of 72 ohm coax between the feedline and the center insulator. The SWR is nice and low across the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00463.html (11,308 bytes)

12. RE: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 08:14:49 -0500
I agree that this system is a hassle to get going. Fortunately, even an old non-computer literate like me was able to get it working with only two e-mails to the support staff. I was really irritate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00191.html (10,993 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] RE: 40 meters to be fixed (score: 1)
Author: w5vx@hiline.net (Bill Parry)
Date: Mon Jul 7 09:48:08 2003
I agree with John. Those of us that prefer cw have always enjoyed the 40 meter band, while SSB has been a mess. This change might make someone really want to work 40 SSB (sorry John :') We would have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00085.html (7,339 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1)
Author: w5vx@HILINE.NET (Bill)
Date: Tue Aug 5 16:32:35 2003
Folks, Tom has it right. Many beginners start contesting because they are building their DXCC/state/county QSL totals. I am still waiting for 4 QSLs (SASE) for my 5BWAZ from 2002 CQWW. If you find so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00117.html (9,848 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Line scores (score: 1)
Author: w5vx@hiline.net (Bill Parry)
Date: Thu Jul 25 21:33:11 2002
Now that this issue seems to be settled, I am willing to accept the change that was voted by our Board of Directors. I would have preferred that the line score had been left in QST but we have electe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00434.html (7,065 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu