Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@charter.net: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] re: working friends (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:03:31 -0800
Hi Jim The deal with working friends is that they need to get on and work more than 1 station (you). If you get 50 (or however many) friends on and all they do is work you, then they are uniques and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00332.html (7,916 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:55:28 -0800
And how much time before the contest starts--10 minutes--half hour--3 days--a week? If you get on during the week before the contest starts to check propagation to VY1 land, does that count as contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00366.html (10,057 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10-4 good buddy (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:22:50 -0800
Hi Bill et al There is a guy down the street from me that has a station that makes me envious. He's running a '751A and a TS 940 to a 30L1 linear. He has a big tower with one of those quad/yagi type
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00444.html (8,043 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:45:42 -0800
I can see how we can enforce the "do not operate on any frequency before the contest" or "don't use any propagation assistance" rules? I guess including a videotape with the log, of the entire contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00480.html (10,309 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:54:28 -0800
W2RU wrote (among other things): the >other, I'd rather have the line scores than text that duplicates the >tabular Top 10 listings. _________________________________________________ Or another artic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00057.html (8,457 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:20:15 -0800
I guess that means I will have to put a computer in the "throne room" for my activities in there. 73 Tom W7WHY _________________________________________________ available on-line? then they can "publ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00202.html (8,209 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:01:45 -0800
can see the ARRL gradually "phasing out" contest support.] And shortly after that, just riding off in the sunset forever. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00274.html (7,592 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signing /QRP In Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 17:20:23 -0800
But a lot of stations read that as "anyone with a Q, R, or P in their callsign, go ahead and call me." Or else why do stations call when it is plain that it is not them the guy is standing by for. 7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00281.html (9,035 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] Categorically Speaking... (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (thomas osborne)
Date: Thu Feb 6 09:44:21 2003
Pete N4ZR wrote (among other things): However, who's to know unless we try it? That's a real good point Pete. Too many people just say "naw, it won't work." before we even try it. How about a QRP cat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00088.html (8,192 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] REALLY long contests (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Thu Feb 6 12:46:33 2003
recall when it was two WEEKS long! Yeah, and if you look at the winning scores--they were usually 300-400 Q's or so in that 2 weeks. Some guys now do that in an hour :-) I've got some old (30's-40's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00092.html (7,787 bytes)

31. [CQ-Contest] 24 vs 48 - NO NEW CATEGORIES! (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Fri Feb 7 09:03:51 2003
to be a contest hour hour" gang It would be easy to do. Either you operate the first 24 or the last 24 hours. Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00113.html (8,132 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] QUOTA'S in the old days (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Sat Feb 8 01:10:43 2003
arguments occured >when the discussions ensued following the suggestion to eliminate the quota system >and make it a more 'free for all' setting. Hi Chuck. I can hear it now--"naw--it won't work." 73
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00125.html (6,914 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] Packet/internet spotting (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Tue Feb 18 01:29:00 2003
the pile. HI Martin et al I don't see why all this "smart" technology we have, the clusters can't let a station put his call in so they cannot be spotted period! Kinda like the telemarketer "do not c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00202.html (7,292 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] Endless CQing (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Wed Feb 26 01:24:59 2003
be grounds for someone else claiming the >frequency, Man, everyone is mising the boat. With all the "smart" software out there, just program it that if you don't work someone in 10 (or 15, or 20, or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00314.html (7,428 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] Callsign (dis)Advatages (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Wed Mar 12 01:57:51 2003
On the positive side, I have always felt that your call should end with a dash, which seems to get thru better, ergo my selection of "K2SX." I have a friend here, KG7DK, and he has all sorts of probl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00124.html (6,876 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Fri Mar 14 01:55:30 2003
has the edge. Hi Kelly, et al In my years of DX'ing, I've finally came to the conclusion that I will never be first one to call in a pileup. I've had much better luck by hanging back a second or so t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00174.html (7,865 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Sun Mar 16 02:13:20 2003
the DX emerge on Hi Pete. Usually I agree with you, but what happens in a pileup when the DX says K5? Utter chaos! 73 Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00189.html (7,339 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Mon Mar 31 18:51:38 2003
I guess it is alright for EO6F to be able to say whatever he wants but it's not alright for Barry to say what he wants. Anyone besides me see something wrong here? Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00293.html (8,269 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] Re: QRZ no call (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Tue Apr 8 06:07:28 2003
But the ones who do it do it well. Everytime I work Jim and he sends "ZD8Z" after I'm done, I realize he means, "R, QSL, I got it, Thanks, See you later." Good operators don't need to give their call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00165.html (6,832 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] Fishy spots in WPX SSB (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Thu Apr 10 04:02:39 2003
HI Hans Am I to judge by your post that you are in favor of self-spotting during a contest? And if someone does it, he (or she) shouldn't be pointed out as doing it? Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00182.html (8,562 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu