Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@frontier.com: 160 ]

Total 160 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] WHY - and other observed behavior (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:13:23 -0800
I think another problem is guys using K-3's with the speed cranked way up sound really choppy. I know there is a setting for QRQ that makes it sound better. Some stations sending really fast sound li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00289.html (8,858 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 20:50:47 -0800
If you want to win, buy lots of towers and aluminium and built up a competitive station. 73 Peter Sorry Peter, but it takes a lot more than that. No matter how much hardware you have, you are not goi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00021.html (8,067 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dr. DX (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:59:16 -0800
I remember they had a contest to see who could work the most countries. Problem was, some figured how to crack it and that kinda ruined it. 73 Tom W7WHY Agreed. It was an amazing program, especially
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00198.html (7,295 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:30:05 -0800
OK - what contest has a level playing field. We can then change them all to that format. 73 Tom W7WHY Having said that, I understand Jeff's frustration about the level playing field. However, I don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00056.html (10,603 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:45:18 -0800
HI John I think some of the software has a setting where it will automatically send a CQ after so many Q's are logged. That would work to make it legal. 73 Tom W7WHY What is the penalty - disqualific
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00176.html (9,113 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:28:03 -0800
If this is really true then, IMO, this is just about the dumbest rule ever! Every decent operator can figure out what is the right strategy for maximizing the rate & score in a certain situation. Som
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00225.html (10,588 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] what else is lost (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:58:13 -0800
Charly, why are you so quick todismiss the idea of a web-based, advertiser-supported magazine? It requires more than QST's images of the paper magazine, but as someone suggested a few weeks ago, ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00030.html (8,683 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:20:50 -0800
On 2/20/2014 11:30 PM, Pedro Piza wrote: Is it legal in the SO2R to call CQ simultameous on two different BANDs.? Then work a station on BAND A and them amswer TO station on BAND B, and start again T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00239.html (8,388 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] You can use the internet to make QSOs? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:06:09 -0800
One thing I've wondered about is what is the difference between someone sending me a text and telling me I have their call wrong, or looking at my computer screen and Skimmer to see what the call is.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00285.html (8,041 bytes)

90. Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Zero Pointers.... (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 16:29:24 -0800
MY .02 Wayne W3EA Hi Mike Dupes are getting to be more of a problem with the 'point and clickers' working you again when Skimmer has the call wrong. I've read on 3830 when a stations gets spotted wro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00050.html (8,263 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] Size of Dual Monitors (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:56:37 -0700
On 3/17/2014 9:56 AM, Steve London wrote: My SO2R layout is essentially the same as Bill's. In addition to having the monitor down low, I would also recommend a separate set of computer-distance eyeg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00165.html (10,314 bytes)

92. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Video Songs (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:29:54 -0700
Most important one: "Turn Your Radio On" Roy Acuff 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00198.html (7,061 bytes)

93. Re: [CQ-Contest] SECRETS OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER: I CAN'T REMEMBER (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:54:33 -0700
If WPX goes back to zero points for in country QSO, this basically becomes another DX contest. The guys in the black whole with 100 watts or low antennas go back to the end of the line. As many have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00142.html (11,075 bytes)

94. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:59:08 -0700
How about letting the software figure it out. Enter all your information, antenna, power, HFTA info, etc, into the logging program and then have it all interfaced with some propagation software. You
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00125.html (10,675 bytes)

95. Re: [CQ-Contest] History of Low Power Category (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:23:45 -0700
I think there were quite a few of us working QRP back in the day, not because we even knew what QRP meant, but most Novices ran little low power rigs as that was what was available to us. If you were
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00144.html (9,462 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] History of Low Power Category (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:40:45 -0700
That is a strange rule. It is illegal to run an amp to get to 100 watts, but it not illegal to run a radio that puts out 400 watts in the NAQP. If they outlaw amps, why not outlaw radios that put out
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00148.html (10,515 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 13:50:02 -0700
Hi Jim Hope the offender wasn't using one of the FT-1000's you sold him :-) 73 Tom W7WHY Yes, I'm saying that users of these dirty rigs need to replace them with cleaner ones. In 2008, I sold a pair
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00057.html (7,177 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] Entry Class -- CQWW Classic Overlay As It Should Be (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:43:02 -0700
I thought the whole idea 'Classic' class was to go back to 'Just a boy and his radio' type of contesting with no spotting, etc. Why have the classic and then just have the same rules as the regular c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00177.html (9,251 bytes)

99. Re: [CQ-Contest] Entry Class -- CQWW Classic Overlay As It Should Be (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:56:56 -0700
Hi Syl Thanks for the clarification. Hard to believe I was wrong in my thinking :-) 73 Tom W7WHY Tom Just a bit of background The idea for the 24-hour category came from an article that Pete & Mike w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00188.html (10,724 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:47:24 -0700
I would think that my old TS-450 must be pretty clean because it seems like just about every RTTY contest I get in, I can be CQ'ing and someone will move in right next to me, inside my 250 cycle pass
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00208.html (12,780 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu