Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@verizon.net: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Criminals (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 14:14:27 -0800
Hi Chuck Yep, it sure is. But if you operate a contest, you need to stay within the rules. They should just make an "unlimited" class where absolutely anything goes--3 kw, self spotting, internet sk
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00174.html (8,052 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Poisson d'Avril Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:35:22 -0800
Oh yeah, I'll bet you post the rules Doug. Probably about 10 minutes after the contest so you will be the only one who did it right, and win again. I see through your little canard. 73 Tom W7WHY ___
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00234.html (7,664 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Poisson d'Avril Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:30:02 -0800
Well, I should do alright in this contest. Both of my radios are broke, but found another way to make contacts. Shouldn't let you all in on my secret, but... There's a website called QTH.COM, and you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00259.html (9,229 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Poisson d'Avril Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:31:07 -0800
-Yeah, but he lives in the wrong state. He should be in O'Regon. Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00260.html (8,719 bytes)

65. [CQ-Contest] Stiub filters (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:13:55 -0800
Howdy All I built some stubs here and they seem to work pretty well on radio 1. I want to put up some more antenna for radio 2. If one of the antennas I use is a G5RV (I know), will I be able to use
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00316.html (6,429 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stunning Upset in Poisson D'Avril (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 17:06:16 -0700
Hi Zack Didn't you see the postings about the "wireless electrical cord." 73 Tom W7WHY (with my new secret weapon winning score) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00024.html (8,435 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Morse Runner SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:27:12 -0700
Yeah, would be great for practice. If it wasn't for Morse Runner on weekends without contests, (like this one), I'd be having withdrawals. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00091.html (7,913 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:06:28 -0700
Why not go to www.n1mm.com and download n1mm logger. It has the module with correct scoring for the 7QP. No kluge's or hassles. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00264.html (7,079 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:50:13 -0700
Now rather than Yeah, but what are you going to take into the "reading room" with you? Kinda crowded in there with a computer :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00176.html (8,729 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ameritron AL-811 for Contesting, OK or not? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:12:10 -0700
Hi All Used to have a FL-2100B here, and now use a SB-200-both with a pair of 572-B's. I've found that putting a couple of muffin fans on top of the amp sure helps to keep things cool. Did a CW conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00001.html (7,385 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] AL-811 for Contesting, OK or not? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:28:15 -0700
I think the reason most people put another "test" (or CQ or whatever) on eht end is so that when someone tunes across your signal they know you are calling CQ. I hate to hear "de W2ABC", then have to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00002.html (8,711 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 20:33:34 -0700
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I think there is a lot of difference between S9 noise and very few signals, and 3 signals crammed into a 600 cycle portion of the spectrum I don't see w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00109.html (10,074 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP Question (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:35:25 -0700
Hi Bob If the DSP was in the IF, it would be a lot better than the outboard units. They are usually installed between the radio and speaker, or headphones. While they work OK, you get a lot of proble
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00145.html (8,672 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] IARU rules (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:31:50 -0700
I was looking at the rules for the IARU this weekend, and was wondering about this: "6.1. The same station may be worked 'once per mode per band' for QSO credit. " "6.1.1. Mixed-mode entries may work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00027.html (6,977 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Scoreboards (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:57:44 -0700
Well, Rick, you opened a can of worms on this one. I could just hear it now, "Yeah, but he had a 2 GHZ computer and mine is only 500 MHZ!" 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00203.html (8,828 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1973 SS CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:06:06 -0700
And don't forget that machine gun exchange from KH6IJ. That was one guy who was all business. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00372.html (9,119 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1960 SS (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:31:03 -0700
Hi John Yeah, dupe sheets were a pain, but at least then, all we had were W's and K's to dupe. Things got pretty bad after that :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00430.html (7,408 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique perspectives (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:00:37 -0700
Hi Jack I know it's a horrible thing to think about, but what is to stop someone from just putting in a bunch of callsigns in their log to make it look like they worked a bunch of uniques. I know no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00432.html (8,940 bytes)

79. [CQ-Contest] IOTA contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:12:38 -0700
Hi All I've never done this contest before, and in looking at the rules I was a little confused about something. Is this a "everybody work everybody" contest or do we just work IOTA stations? Thanks
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00475.html (6,413 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] IOTA contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:52:39 -0700
Thank you gents (and gentettes) for the info. Look for you all this weekend. Looking forward to my first IOTA. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00484.html (7,171 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu