Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why1@gmail.com: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Its not the Sunspots folks (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 17:43:40 -0700
Yep - it's a DX contest - if you live on the east coast. It is pretty amazing how op's on the east coast piss and moan about any rule change when they are having a ball working Europe and the left co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00073.html (10,705 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why I like contesting more and DXing less (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:14:46 -0800
DX'ing used to be fun when it took a little work to get the DX station. I can remember having to check propagation, figure which band they may be on, LP or SP, where they listening, etc. They had the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00273.html (10,842 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] signing TEST at the end...not so bad (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:55:44 -0800
But not a whole lot of them operated from the Pacific Northwest (or from the 'black hole'). Even the biggest M/M stations out here finish way down on the list. It is a whole different world, operatin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00150.html (10,462 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Allowing self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:46:50 -0800
I call CQ on CW or RTTY and Skimmer spots me. I call CQ,someone calls and I ask them to spot me. What is the difference?? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest maili
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00233.html (9,039 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] joke on me (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:26:03 -0800
May be we need to go back to the way we were taught as novices back in the day: cq cq cq de w7why w7why w7why cq cq cq de w7why w7why w7why cq cq cq de w7why w7why w7why k Good old 3 x 3 :-) 73 Tom W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00020.html (7,286 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet ruined ham radio (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:02:41 -0800
Isn't being spotted by the RBN 'assisted'? People say that, "I never use the cluster", but they are being helped by it when they get spotted. All the same as far as I can see - no 'unassisted' catego
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00148.html (8,269 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you a Clueless Cluster Clicker? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:06:40 -0800
Where is the 'Like' button for this comment?? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00153.html (10,279 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] what is required of recevied audio, and whay (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:44:32 -0800
Ton W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00223.html (9,032 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:03:56 -0700
Is there a 'compelling' reason NOT to? Maybe it is because some people CAN'T do it so they don't want ANYBODY to do it. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00357.html (9,387 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSO's (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:46:48 -0700
I think you will find that most of the bigger M/M's run 2 radios on each band with 2 op's. They can interleave on 4 or 5 bands at the same time. Talk about taking up bandwidth :-) 73 Tom W7WHY ______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00401.html (8,115 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:44:45 -0700
This sounds like it is turning into a Colin Kaepernick NFL debacle. The outcome isn't gonna be good with all the bitching. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00404.html (9,710 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:48:22 -0700
How many are able to do what these op's who are running 2 pileups do. I think not many. Can't see where it would be as big an impact on the spectrum. When you have a multi op where 2 ops are listenin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00432.html (11,765 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:48:00 -0700
I think there will be lots of room when guys just quit contesting. I've been doing this stuff for 63 years now and can't believe all the pissing and moaning about rules, etc. . I can't believe someon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00513.html (10,312 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Same-Band Dueling CQs Now Prohibited in All ARRL Contests (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:16:24 -0700
What's next SO@R?? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00051.html (10,146 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hogging Coefficient (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 13:00:02 -0700
Especially when you figure they have 2 stations per band operating at the same time, running and S&p. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00111.html (7,913 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:03:07 -0700
If someone could explain why we HAVE to have spotting, it might make the discussion more relevant. We got by for 60 years without it and now all of a sudden we can't do a contest without spots??? She
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00369.html (11,419 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:09:20 -0700
Will a human operator still be necessary? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00409.html (12,170 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] What is Multi to you? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 13:27:18 -0700
Ed - you left out the biggie. To win you must live on the east coast with a chip shot to Europe on the low bands. Look at the big M/M stations in the west or midwest and someone with a very modest st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00079.html (9,079 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Americas Cup Sailing - Watch and Learn (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 14:42:41 -0700
Excellent post Bill. Guys on the east coast just don't understand what it is to do a DX contest here on the left coast with the sunspot numbers in the toilet. If we're lucky, we just MIGHT get an ove
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00151.html (8,563 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] America's cup Sailboat racing not what it used to be (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:20:50 -0700
Those aren't sailboats any more. More like some morphodite, hydrofoil, water craft that race each other. Pretty soon they won't even need anyone on board - just let the computers, hydraulics, and GPS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00314.html (8,483 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu