Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji@contesting.com: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] Advice on CW/contest rig for $1000-$2000? (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu May 3 20:29:48 2001
In October 1999 the previous year's growth was 1/2 percent. The growth for the year following the CW reduction was 1 percent. The only large change was upgrades from General to Extra, which was 30%.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00054.html (10,177 bytes)

62. [CQ-Contest] FT1000MP click reduction (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu May 24 15:41:07 2001
The FT1000MP is entirely different than the 1000D or 1000. It keys the carrier after the filters, not before them. The problem with the MP is entirely due to the waveshape of the envelope near the ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00263.html (7,961 bytes)

63. [CQ-Contest] MP clicks (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Sat May 26 01:18:42 2001
Hi George, Thanks for looking at the MP. I sure wish I would have looked at all this years ago! IMO the .1 uF cap or larger is acceptable with the added resistor. IMO ~2mS rise and fall is shorter th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00277.html (7,283 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] MP clicks (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon May 28 19:59:40 2001
George and I are talking off the reflector. I'm sure we will either agree or agree to disagree with good reason soon. AGC is NOT an issue because the main signal is outside the passband of the recei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00288.html (11,774 bytes)

65. [CQ-Contest] MP clicks (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue May 29 12:35:08 2001
Slowing the CW does not reduce the bandwidth in typical operation. Changing CW speed can change the spacing of sidebands and the number of clicks per second, but not the overall bandwidth of transmi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00299.html (7,470 bytes)

66. [CQ-Contest] MP clicks (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed May 30 21:36:38 2001
CCIR standards and the FCC, which the CW keying section in the Handbook is based on, say: 2ms rise and a fall is good for 100 WPM or so in a K5 (fading) circuit and 150 wpm in non-fading circuits. 5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00322.html (7,633 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] Tx-Rx Offset Standards (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon Apr 1 16:06:28 2002
Hi Sege, I am not sure if you are serious, but this is the day we have for jokes in the USA. In case anyone takes that serious, it was not. The earth could rotate 10,000 miles per second, and there
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00009.html (8,100 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:19:43 -0400
Even lightning doesn't move around as much as this thread. Since the cloud is the primary concentration point of charge, there is very little you can do about it except to have something discharge th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00003.html (11,101 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: IC-756 Pro II CW Settings (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:29:30 -0500
setting is 4 msec with clicks to reduce for this radio I wonder why manufacturers bother to give a rise and fall number that is so far off?? Do you think they count rise and fall times as the sum of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00499.html (7,966 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating with Packet (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:57:35 -0500
....and that minority makes what? A few multipliers more and virtually no more QSO's. Big deal. It isn't worth doing that any more than it is worth working someone on 7125 or 7127 LSB, or going down
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00609.html (10,173 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating with Packet (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:19:00 -0500
Perhaps you haven't been following the thread closely. Some people aren't making sense or even offering solutions. They are using this as a forum to open the door to generally degrading anyone who i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00624.html (9,352 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2008 CQ WW 160m DX Contest - Missing Class??? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:10:31 -0500
Let's assume I have a Bird 43 showing 140W forward and 15W reflected using a 250W slug. The power reading error range of a Bird 43 using a 250W slug (calibrated to factory spec) for both forward and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00650.html (9,487 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:34:28 -0500
I think what computer programmers need to do is have a "signal lost" indicator on the screen. RTTY is not like normal modes (sorry, the Devil made me say that) in that the operator often cannot hear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00037.html (8,635 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Pedition FRAGILE Luggage Labels (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:20:40 -0500
One thing you have to remember is a big hard case doesn't protect the rig from anything but punctures or point impacts. All of the real protection is in the padding. I've seen several radios and doz
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00094.html (9,957 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] RG-6 connector issues/ rcv array (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:54:35 -0500
Different problem. That was a rigid jacket. He described flexible cables with foil and woven shields, not solid extruded non-ribbed (unlike Heliax, which is ribbed) shields like those that created p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00234.html (9,865 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] Topband: RG-6 connector issues/ rcv array (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:02:49 -0500
Very doubtful unless you have the cable firmly anchored at the ends with no slack or stress relief. It is normally from mechanical tension either during or after installation. Been there, had it hap
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00237.html (8,861 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] Some people don't think much of hams (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:24:24 -0500
http://ema.arrl.org/article.php?sid=802 73, Tom W8JI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00239.html (6,839 bytes)

78. Topband: 160 Meter QRM from WRJS (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:59:36 -0500
We have another AM BC station that has been running amuck on 160. I got a positive ID on it tonight. It is WRJS in Swainsboro GA. According to the FCC database (might not be current) they are suppose
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00245.html (7,141 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores.org Changes/Improvements... (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:42:17 -0500
Anyone who sleeps during a contest for any reason obviously does not want to win very bad. The only possible exception is a ten meter or 160 meter contest. I just can't imagine being "tired" and pul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00317.html (9,995 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Whoa now - SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:58:17 -0500
Lee, Something like that would be interesting to everyone. I'd certainly enjoy that myself. Hopefully someone knows something and has a helpful link or article. Right now we are slowly building a SO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00334.html (8,114 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu