Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9sz.zack@gmail.com: 360 ]

Total 360 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] The damn robot won (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:21:44 -0500
I think it should be able to drink vodka. Maybe after 4 or 5 bottles it won't be able to use those three hands! 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00184.html (9,478 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:20 -0500
I hope so. Somehow it just doesn't seem right to me. I could set up a remote receiving site for 160 meters in Europe and be able to hear hundreds of stations I might never hear in the USA. People in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00200.html (14,808 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22 (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:51:17 -0500
I think the key is in the words "amateur radio communications" you stated below. Anything that uses a link or part of one that is not radio for any distance takes it out of the amateur RADIO category
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00210.html (9,919 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Extreme (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:42:44 -0500
What if 20 meters and 160 meters aren't open at the same time? 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00257.html (9,155 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Old WoodPecker (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:26:18 -0500
Fascinating, Brett. Supposedly ZC4 was also the souirce of the shortwave spy numbers transmissions from the station known as "the Lincolnshire Poacher." It disappeared about a year ago and hasn't bee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00341.html (13,550 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Old WoodPecker (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:50:06 -0500
Yeah, the Mossad have many transmissions a day in their spy numbers system. I listen to some of them at least once a week. The British "Cherry Ripe" station which is supposedly transmitting from Guam
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00356.html (10,926 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] False signals (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:28:53 -0500
Well, I would have to look at how "false and deceptive" something is. Everyone wants a high score in a contest. So what affects the score and what doesn't? In SS, if you use a different check than th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00373.html (9,243 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sprint and Different names (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:47:17 -0500
Me either. Like I said, if it changes a score or results and is done to gain an unfair advantage, it becomes inportant. If it does none of those things, who cares? 73, Zack W9SZ _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00388.html (11,621 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] adding challenges to field day (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:37:19 -0500
Our local club had a great site on a farm that we used for decades. Then either the farm got sold or the owners got too old and we lost that site. We tried several others for some years but they just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00414.html (13,068 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] writelog on XP (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 09:00:35 -0500
I have not used Writelog but my computer running XP has a ZIP drive, printer and scanner on the LPT port and all work fine. Maybe it's a problem specific to the Writelog software when running XP? 73,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00044.html (7,752 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Five DQ's Mark 2008 CQ WW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:42:31 -0500
I don't know how they determine this. Do they look at the times in other peoples' logs? What if you work several people in a row whose clocks are all off by a few minutes? It could happen, no matter
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00242.html (15,158 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] WAEDC CW: only for Extra class USA (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:27:24 -0500
There is no rule that says I have to operate in every contest that comes along. If I don't like the rules, I won't operate in a contest. This has beena big deal with some Rovers in some of the VHF+ c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00287.html (10,060 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] 10 minute rule explained (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:58:23 -0500
Yes but why 10 minutes? Why not one or two minutes? 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00298.html (7,852 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting rationale (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:08:31 -0500
Maybe you cannot overload the Internet, but what about overloading the operators? Let's assume everyone is self-spotting and the spots are coming across at a nice casual rate - about 4 a second. How
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00318.html (9,941 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did'ja ever wonder? (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:43:54 -0500
Yeah, he can go portable to California and operate from SCV. Better yet, go to NWT and operate from VY1. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00024.html (10,213 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ten Commandments for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:09:15 -0500
Cool! As a note on #1, it's a sure bet that if you don't log a QSO, the other guy is going to request a QSL. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00126.html (7,455 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Results of Age Survey (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:19:41 -0500
How does the age first licensed in the "Total average data" work out to 7 if the averages in the 3 categories below that are between 16 and 18? Interesting results! I guess I'm close to typical for U
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00232.html (10,068 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Question/interpretation (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:03:57 -0500
This is getting pretty absurd if you ask me. Maybe the rules should be changed slightly to say "only one OPERATOR can contribute to the final score ..." That would eliminate the local pizza delivery
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00043.html (14,039 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Rules Question (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:21:20 -0500
I only see that applying to the particular station that is considered an "entrant." I would assume that one of the ops making a go of it from his home station as a single op is using a different call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00262.html (9,520 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Need advice re amps/setups for contesting (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:02:02 -0600
I don't have too many "pet peeves" in contesting, but one of them is the station/operator who calls CQ and by the time I've said/sent my call once in response, they're well into another CQ. And I hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00362.html (10,342 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu