Mail Archive Search: <+from:wa3nko@ix.netcom.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3nko@ix.netcom.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Power Entry (score: 1): Author: wa3nko@ix.netcom.com (David Molvin); Date: Mon Feb 18 21:12:10 2002; I used to log exactly what they sent UNTIL I started losing too many = points when the log checking started...Now I take my best shot at what I = think he meant and hope for the best! David, WA3NKO -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00243.html (7,382 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] re:copying what was sent.. (score: 1): Author: wa3nko@ix.netcom.com (David Molvin); Date: Thu Feb 21 21:30:12 2002; OK guys, so what are we supposed to log when the other guy sends "5nn n" When I logged this as "599 9" which is what was sent I lost my contact. Contacts like this is why I now take my best guess...; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00345.html (7,061 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Cheating with Packet (score: 1): Author: David Molvin <wa3nko@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:18:15 +0000 (GMT+00:00); Seems like a rather simple solution to me...get rid of telnet. Keep the assisted category. What would this accomplish? Well, for those who remember packet when that is what it was, when the contest r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00606.html (8,973 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]