Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wc1m@msn.com: 83 ]

Total 83 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:50:17 -0400
I was directing my comment to the innocent VE who inadvertently participates in an illegal contact initiated by a US station transmitting out of band. I think the VE, if he/she knows the contact is i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00101.html (22,102 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:09:39 -0400
Right. Having never heard a double call sign ID, I would guess either it's exceedingly rare for a regular contest station licensee to have less than Extra class privileges, or people don't know the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00102.html (9,778 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes -Automatic Fill - 93 or 67 (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:19:00 -0400
The fact that you can't know what the other station logs is probably why the status quo in log checking is to *not* hold you responsible for the other station's errors -- up to a point. You won't be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00212.html (16,029 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 83
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu