Mail Archive Search: <+from:wd4ahz@gte.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:wd4ahz@gte.net: 94 ]

Total 94 documents matching your query.

81. [CQ-Contest] Re: (CQ-Contest) "It's not a contest." (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Fri Jun 28 09:25:07 2002; <snip> EXACTLY! Here's what our FD gang received from a new contest recruit ... The opportunity to work next to some of the best operators in our hobby, and have them take the time to "coach" newcome; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00286.html (7,397 bytes)
82. [CQ-Contest] IARU Early-Bird submissions (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Fri Jul 12 15:51:11 2002; The "early-bird" logs sent to logs@wrtc2002.org are used to check the WRTC competitors logs (and for WRTC prizes/awards) The logs sent to IARUHF@iaru.org is the "official" log submission address (lik; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00105.html (7,585 bytes)
83. [CQ-Contest] IARU test newbie question (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Mon Jul 15 19:35:10 2002; More than likely, you'll get "QSO B4 QRZ" and be SOL for a second QSO (which again, is a reason to work dupes ... just in case one of the two made an error). On the other hand, if you count the QSO .; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00147.html (7,389 bytes)
84. [CQ-Contest] WRTC Results? (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Mon Jul 15 19:40:36 2002; After all the pre-WRTC hype ... it's now after 1:30 AM in OH land ... 7 1/2 hours after the Awards Dinner. Who won? What teams were behind the OJ calls? Waiting to find out ... Ron, WD4AHZ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00148.html (6,510 bytes)
85. [CQ-Contest] Wot's Up in Finland? (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Tue Jul 16 10:09:28 2002; Here are the Top 5 1 N5TJ/K1TO 2 RA3AUU/RV1AW 3 DL2CC/DL6FBL 4 N6MJ/N2NL 5 KQ2M/W7WA "The N6TJ/N6AA score was inflated by TR and they finished about 15th." K1TO/N5TJ were OJ3A. That's the only one I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00164.html (7,477 bytes)
86. [CQ-Contest] WRTC FINAL RESULTS (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Tue Jul 16 11:03:18 2002; THE FINAL RESULTS OF WRTC2002: 1. OJ3A N5TJ/K1TO 438/2782 = 1.629.798 2. OJ8E RA3AUU/RV1AW 426/2627 = 1.619.226 3. OJ2V DL2CC/DL6FBL 473/2468 = 1.608.673 4. OJ3R N6MJ/N2NL 436/2705 = 1.560.008 5. OJ8; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00166.html (8,416 bytes)
87. [CQ-Contest] Why IARU? (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Thu Jul 18 12:29:43 2002; A couple thoughts come to mind ... Contest that allows "mixed mode" - what the WRTC teams will need to maximize their score. 24 hours - means teams will need to know propagation and what bands to be; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00227.html (9,054 bytes)
88. [CQ-Contest] Ideas for WRTC 2004 (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Thu Jul 18 15:35:49 2002; Which is why this is against WRTC rules! 5. Language Only English language and common international abbreviations can be used - both on SSB and CW. 8. Soliciting QSOs ... The operators are not allowe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00231.html (8,517 bytes)
89. [CQ-Contest] Section News and Contest Results (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Mon Jul 22 11:09:44 2002; Frank, Thanks for your support in keeping Section News and Contest Results in QST. Unfortunately, this was already a "done deal" scheduled for the last BOD Meeting ... but the membership "outcry" put; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00308.html (7,243 bytes)
90. [CQ-Contest] Follow The Money (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Tue Jul 23 12:35:05 2002; Why is everyone missing the point? Kid Q. Public picks up a QST at the local newsstand and skims through it. He sees a bunch of "low tech" articles and a lot of nice photos of people doing stuff with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00329.html (8,403 bytes)
91. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Tue Jul 23 12:36:48 2002; Or those who want only NCJ, yet remain an ARRL member. Ron; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00330.html (7,982 bytes)
92. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Tue Jul 23 13:46:46 2002; Because "Fifty percent of dues is allocated to QST, the balance for membership". You don't want QST ... you pay half the current dues. Ron; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00339.html (9,155 bytes)
93. [CQ-Contest] Re: Why not complain about CQ also? (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Thu Jul 25 02:23:09 2002; The idea of cutting line scores is to reduce the number of pages in QST (I've heard 16 pages will be cut) - not free them up for something else. Cutting line scores and section news reduces the numbe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00414.html (8,260 bytes)
94. [CQ-Contest] From the ARRL Letter (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Sat Oct 5 02:42:20 2002; PREFERENCES The ARRL is surveying its membership regarding which future on-line ARRL Certification and Continuing Education (C-CE) courses hams would be most likely to take. The list of possibilitie; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00046.html (7,911 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 94
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]