Mail Archive Search: <+from:wd5acr@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:wd5acr@comcast.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Late to the skimmer party (score: 1): Author: wd5acr@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:55:01 +0000; I haven't read the whole thread, so this may be a redundant suggestion, but why not create a fully automated class? Let the ugly bags of mostly water struggle it out, while the superior machines use; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00596.html (14,259 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: wd5acr@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:38:24 +0000 (UTC); I'd like to propose a change in the wording of the rules. Something along the lines of "...then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00241.html (16,069 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Perils of online spotting (score: 1): Author: wd5acr@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:39:36 +0000 (UTC); I'd say QSL via the bureau and see what comes back.... ;-) Dumb newbie question - testing out DX Summit during the recent ARRL CW DX contest, I happened upon a spot entered by a Canadian station for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00308.html (10,197 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]