Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:will.roberts@pgnmail.com: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Moving "Dayton" around - an idea... (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:02:01 -0400
Scott speaketh the truth... For many years, the only hamfest that I have been to is Dayton. It has nothing to do with where it is geographically. I don't like the city of Dayton much at all, and the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00124.html (10,346 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Recruiting women into ham radio (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:52:44 -0500
With the recent discussion of women in ham radio (or the lack thereof), I think we would be remiss in not recognizing the efforts of the Society of Midwest Contesters in their never ending efforts to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00371.html (7,930 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Why we spot rivals (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:18:48 -0500
I have thought about the "spotting rivals" phenomenon as well. I think it comes down to the fact that even though we love to compete, the friendships and fraternity of contesting ultimately are more
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00330.html (8,579 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] SO2R equipment (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:40:27 -0500
I'm interested in using the following for SO2R with N1MM logger and would like to hear from guys who are using this setup: Top Ten Dx Doubler Array Solutions Six Pak Top Ten Band Decoders Tnx / 73, W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00358.html (6,593 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Cheating / contest recording / packet / SO2R et.al (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:23:10 -0500
My head is about to explode reading the same endless posts about these subjects! I challenge everyone (especially contest sponsors) to make one overall priority in making changes to any contests - Wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00577.html (7,991 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] 59 - Just do it (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:10:09 -0400
My head is about to explode! This topic is worse than the unassisted Skimmer thread. If the rules say send a signal report, just send 59 or 599 as fast as you can, then move on with the rest of the e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00056.html (7,771 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Contest results (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 11:04:18 -0400
Personally I don't have a problem with the results coming out months after a contest. Most all contest sponsors rely on volunteers to do the thankless job of adjudicating logs. In the event that they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00011.html (8,413 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] cq-contest-lawyer's mailing list! (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:54:35 -0400
With all due respect to the real contesting lawyers (K4BAI, K4QPL, K1VR, etc.), that's an excellent suggestion :>) Just when "Skimmer" gets its own reflector and you thought that some sanity and civi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00080.html (8,136 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Valid SS QSO (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:04:25 -0500
I worked the same guy because I needed KP4 for a multiplier. He gave me his call, a number and precedent. I stuck with it and asked him for the "year he was first licensed" and "confirm you're in Pue
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00301.html (8,632 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Vietnam QTH (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:37:01 -0500
I believe that Hiroo XW2A used to have a DX rental shack in Vietnam. I'm not sure if it's still in operation, but he would be a good person to contact as he has connections there. 73, Will AA4NC / W4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00142.html (7,363 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Florida QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:49:33 -0400
Anyone know when the Florida QSO Party is? In hours/minutes and seconds? (I really miss OJ about this time of year). 73, Will AA4NC PS: (Yes - I really know when the contest is) _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00265.html (6,642 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Fi-Ni Report (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:40:11 -0400
What's the matter Sparky? Lack of sunspots and the usual is too/is not virtual frequency battles here on cq-contest got you down? Point your browser over to http://fi-ni-report.blogspot.com for the R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00002.html (7,561 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bandpass filter (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:54:59 -0400
If you are single op/1 radio and never listen on a band other than the one you are transmitting on, a bandpass filter isn't necessary. If you have a second receiver, then a bandpass filter could be h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00005.html (8,261 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Remote Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@pgnmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:27:50 -0500
I am all for remote contest operation. As long as the RADIO part of this is done legally and within the contest rules, I don't see a downside. The up side is more contest participation and it allows
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00080.html (8,598 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu